POST YOUR 3DMARK2001 SCORES!!!!

[Logan2002]

ok finally i have been here since last year I have not posted the scores on my desk top yet.

Ok here are the specs

Celeron 1ghz @ 1.10ghz

1 gig pc133 (115) samsung

radeon 7500 64 ddr

winxp pro

score: 2958

What do you think? It is only a 1ghz.

[ComPooTer]

not too shabby!!

pretty good scores for your setup i would say

[pandaz3]

Yes good scores for your hardware. 2001SE is a gaming benchmark for "High End" games and obviously your computer can do those things you like.

[fizur2002]

My thoughts are is that if your computer does what you want it to do, then more power to you. So obviously he isnt worried about his comp being out of date, so kudos to you. (kinda off topic) But no too shabby considering your setup.

[Logan2002]

Next I have to post my wifes computer.

It's specs:

Celeron 1.7ghz @ to 2.ghz

512MB ddr 2100

gf mx 440 64 ddr

also win xp pro.

I like my setup but i realize that I need to upgrade. At the moment my bud. will not allow me to upgrade (well I can up the ram tho....I really need to)

I do turn off alot of the eye candy I mean my ram can handle it but the vid card and the cpu can't. So I turn alot of things off. It still looks alot better than consoles though!

When I get a hdd for my laptop (bought it in 2000 and did heavy gaming on it, it's also a celeron a mobile coppermine)

[ComPooTer]

3dmark01: 18617

Ati Radeon 9800 PRO 128mb (432/364.50)
AMD 2500+ [email protected]
512 Crucial DDR400
Asus a7n8x Deluxe
120GB Maxtor 7200RPM 8mb Cache IDE HD

[MrBurns]

Originally posted by Logan2002
ok finally i have been here since last year I have not posted the scores on my desk top yet.

Ok here are the specs

Celeron 1ghz @ 1.10ghz

1 gig pc133 (115) samsung

radeon 7500 64 ddr

winxp pro

score: 2958

What do you think? It is only a 1ghz.

You haver a Celeron w/ 1GB RAM. This makes about as much sense as a Radeon 9200 w/ 256MB V-RAM. You could get a much better score by getting a better video-card.

btw., what is the score of your wifes computer?

[ComPooTer]

either he can overclock or get a good P3 and overclock those babies

[blacknight31k]

2001se marks are:9914

xp-1800 (not the good one)
8rda+ vers.1.1
2x256 ddr-2100
maxtor 40gig hd
ati 9600 pro
win xp-pro

what do u guys think any good?

[EasyFast]

5500 Score

Just built a new rig for my office PC. I wasn't expecting a huge score, since I cut a few corners, but I duplicated my home gaming system with scores in the 13K + range.

New System - 3dMark 5500

Asus A7N8X-VM
2 x 256MB Samsung DDR3200
XP2400+ Tbred
MSI FX5200 8X 125MB
WD 80gb SE 7200rpm 8mb cache
Zelman Copper Flower Cooler

Game System - 3dMark 13K+

Asus A7N8X (non-deluxe)
2 x 512MB Samsung DDR2100
XP2400+ Tbred
MSI Ti4200 4X 128MB (OC'd)
WD 80gb SE 7200rpm 8mb cache
Zelman Copper Flower Cooler

I'm running XP Home on both systems with the latest updates. On the new system I downloaded the latest Nvidia chipset drivers and detonator drivers from Nvidia, but I'm not sure which ones. The older game system those drivers are slightly older and since they work very well, why mess with success

The poor score on the new system could be the drivers, but I can't imagine they would be that bad.

I believe the problem is the board. This VM version of the A7N8X is missing a lot of features and the reviews are awful, mostly relating to stability. You can't adjust anything in the Bios! There are only two Dimm slots for Ram, and they are suppose to be dual channel. The board seems stable.

I know the FX Graphics board is not a race horse, but from the reviews I have seen, it almost keeps pace with the Ti4200. So it should do much better.

One final note. Other then the (cheap version, should have gone deluxe) board being a major mistake on my part, I bought an Antec case thinking that since it came with 300W PS from Antec, it would be a great bargain. Well all the Voltages are low 11.4v, 4.6v, 1.4v on the rail. Could this be the problem? I have already ordered a new PS. I love the case!

Suggestions? I don't plan to game on this new system, but I do plan to run some photo editing software and I am a power user. So I would be happy with a score around 9K.

[Rugor]

No the FX5200 doesn't keep pace with the Ti4200. Depending on which model you have you could have difficulty keeping up with the MX440.

That's what's going to be holding you back the most.

[EasyFast]

Originally posted by Rugor
No the FX5200 doesn't keep pace with the Ti4200. Depending on which model you have you could have difficulty keeping up with the MX440.

That's what's going to be holding you back the most.

That's not what I wanted to hear

If thats true, then it makes me angry at the "hammer" for their review. Ugh!

This is a 128mb card!....and the MX440 was a [*-deleted word-*]
card to begin with.

Well, live and learn. I guess I made a bad choice on both the mother board and the graphics card. I should have known better then to rush into building a system. Leave it to Asus and Nvidia to promote new products based on old products reputation. Never thought I would buy a new Nvidia card with 128mb of ram and have it be worse then a MX440 or get a junky A7N8X motherboard. Who would have thought

I guess I will sell off the [*-deleted word-*]
and go with ATI since this is the last straw for me with Nvidia GPU. And maybe go with my old favorite Abit motherboard.

(*** Polite language only please *** - WSUA 3. a.)

[cwin]

It isnt the motherboard i dont think... all the delux has is some extra features. In my case it is SATA, RAID, Voice reporter, better onboard sound... and some other things. The motherboard is just the same without some extras. It shouldnt hit the performance.

[maxxx]

AMD 1700+
Gforce fx5600 256 mb
ECS k7s5a

3Dmark = 6970

[morpheus kain]

Mobo is fine.... You're obvious lack of research before you buy products isn't.