Page 64 of 101 FirstFirst ... 14 54 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 74 ... LastLast
Results 946 to 960 of 1502

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK2001 SCORES!!!!

  1. #946
    I got pie!!! Ammok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Stoke.UK
    Posts
    4,589
    nimh

    its not a bad score, but it is worthwhile using the compare feature to see what other people are getting with the same setup, obviously those that oc will have higher, but there be a large bunch in the middle who run at stock, and you can compare your scores with those.
    Life is a bowl of cherries

  2. #947
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    11
    help i just installed directx 9 cause of a game
    and now i cant run 3DMark2001 SE (build 330)

    i uninstalled it and rebooted and then installed it again

    still same problem???

  3. #948
    Ultimate Member x51out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
    Posts
    1,434
    You shouldn't have had to install DX9 because of a game as no game that I know of even requires it. Besides that though, I installed it as well and have had no problems... somthing I can't say about going from DX7 to DX8 (problems). But that was then, and those problems were resolved. Try un and re-installing the video card drivers as well....(like you never thought of that already... )

  4. #949
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    11
    well freelancer did require dx9, thats why i just installed it
    i am running xp pro sp1

    just downloaded the patch to upgrade 3dmark2001 se pro to build 330 and applied it and it worked

    seems the source i has wasnt 330

    thanks

    was installing dx9 a bad idea all in all?

  5. #950
    Ultimate Member x51out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
    Posts
    1,434
    Freelancer? Really? Gotta check that out. Hope I'm not getting behind the curve .
    I don't see why installing DX9 would be a bad idea as DirectX is backwards compatible and DX9 has some optimizations over DX8.1 (apparently... I haven't noticed anything).

  6. #951
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    Freelancers not bad, i played the demo, its mouse driven interace is a bit of a bugger though, its tougher on the wrists than a copy of playboy

    --Jakk

  7. #952
    Member Necide's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    106
    P4, 2.66 GHz, 512k L2, retail box w/ retail HSF
    Abit SR7-8X, rev 1.0 [only revision there is, I believe] -
    SiS 648 chipset, BIOS is 1st release (un-upgraded)
    512 MB of Samsung CL2.5 PC-2700 DDR (1 module)
    Sapphire Radeon 8500LE 128mb, 250/225* (core/mem)

    *I was under the impression most Radeon 8500s were by default clocked at 275/275 and that Radeon 8500LEs were by default clocked at 250/250. Well this one came at 250/200 and is unstable at 250/250. Feh!

    Anyway...

    9050 3D marks

    [edit: video now @ 275/225, stable - 9350 3D Marks]
    Last edited by Necide; 03-17-2003 at 02:24 AM.

  8. #953
    Member mykel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    San Jose, CA. USA
    Posts
    283
    AMD 2400+ @ 2.117
    Asus A7N8X Dlx BIOS 1002A
    3x 512MB Samsung DDR PC2700
    GF TI4600 Xtasy
    Just got the new benchmark numbers....

    3DMark 2001 = 14,711


    Click to compare
    Last edited by mykel; 03-15-2003 at 03:49 PM.

  9. #954
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Under Hill and Over Hill
    Posts
    112
    Bit of an update:

    I've swapped out my nVidia Geforce2 MX200 for a brandy-new ATI Radeon 9700 Pro.

    My old score running 1024x768x32 was 1361. The new score is 9783!!!

    Talk about a HUGE jump!! I'm very psyched. With 4x FSAA running, I still score 7902. Pretty good from all I can gather.

    But now then....What can I do to tweak this even higher (not that I'm not EXTREMELY pleased... UT2K3 looks A-M-A-Z-I-N-G when set at 1024x768x32 and with high or highest details!! I'd just like to see what more I can do...). I'll list my specs below and maybe someone can give me some advice. There's a new processor in my coming future, probably a Northwood P4 2.4, so bear that in mind when checking my specs out. You should also probably consider that I'm *not* running fast-writes, though my MOBO can support it if I flash my bios. At this time, I've read too many conflicting reports to trust the fast-writes.

    Thanks for all advice in advance.


    MSI 645 Ultra Mainboard w/400Watt PS
    P4 1.6GHz (Willy, I think)
    1.02 GB PC2100 DDR
    40GB 7200RPM Seagate HD
    ATI RADEON 9700 PRO w/ Catalyst 3.1
    Creative Labs Audigy Gamer
    Yamaha CRW2200E
    Win98SE running DirectX 8.1

    -Mr. Underhill.
    Last edited by Mr. Underhill; 03-16-2003 at 10:37 AM.

  10. #955
    Senior Member pandaz3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    865
    Your new 2.4 will boost you 1500 points or so and make you more happy with your overall performance. There are new Cat 3.2 drivers at ATI's website


    www.ati.com


    they have a menu on far left and it says "Find a driver" click on that and then 9700 Pro, Win 98, agree to there small print and save or open as you see fit.
    Rig 1, MSI K9A2 Platinum, 6400 Blackie, 2 X 2048 AData, MSI 3870; Rig 2, MSI K9A2 CF, 5000 Blackie, 2 X 1024 Patriot PC6400, ATI X1900 XT, Rig 3, Abit AN8 Fatal1ty, Opteron 185, 2 X 1024 Corsair PC3200C2PT ATI X1950 XTX Rig 4 Abit UL8 3800 X850 Pro

  11. #956
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Middle of NoWhere
    Posts
    43
    with my Radeon 7000 32MB DDR, I got a score of a whopping 1243. Wow!

    That was with the newest drivers.
    "I am a Bomb Technician. If you see me running, try to keep up."

  12. #957
    Senior Member pandaz3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    865
    With the Cat 3.2's I got

    10287

    XP 2100+, 9500 Pro at 330/290, AMD 761 Chipset (266 FSB), 768 PC2100 CL 2.5
    Rig 1, MSI K9A2 Platinum, 6400 Blackie, 2 X 2048 AData, MSI 3870; Rig 2, MSI K9A2 CF, 5000 Blackie, 2 X 1024 Patriot PC6400, ATI X1900 XT, Rig 3, Abit AN8 Fatal1ty, Opteron 185, 2 X 1024 Corsair PC3200C2PT ATI X1950 XTX Rig 4 Abit UL8 3800 X850 Pro

  13. #958
    Senior Member ATI RADEON 8500's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    943
    What??? How is that posible? My system owns yours!

    AMD ATHLON XP 1900+
    Sapphire Radeon 9500 non pro ~RED BOARD~ 128 meg @ 355/310 using Rage3D
    CATALYST 3.1
    256 MB PC2100 DDR RAM CL 2.5
    ECS k7s5a
    Window XP Home SP1

    3DMARK2001 SE score = 10,400

    Originally posted by pandaz3
    With the Cat 3.2's I got

    10287

    XP 2100+, 9500 Pro at 330/290, AMD 761 Chipset (266 FSB), 768 PC2100 CL 2.5
    Attached Images Attached Images

  14. #959
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    Hmmmmmmmmm Pandaz3 I got 10268 with an XP 1800+ 9500 Pro@stock 256mb of PC2100 at CL 2.5 on an AMD 761 chipset board. Using the Cat 3.1's.

    You may be able to tweak yours higher.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  15. #960
    Senior Member pandaz3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Hillsboro, Oregon
    Posts
    865
    Untill I got the 3.2's I was limited to 295/290. I will try a little more GPU speed, but the Memory won't go higher. It is an ATI Card with Infineon Memory and I did flash the BIOS, but nothing else, I am using Rivatuner to OC it. If I can get more I will be happy, but this is okay too. BTW is your CPU OC'd. I have a Gigabyte 7DXR board.
    Rig 1, MSI K9A2 Platinum, 6400 Blackie, 2 X 2048 AData, MSI 3870; Rig 2, MSI K9A2 CF, 5000 Blackie, 2 X 1024 Patriot PC6400, ATI X1900 XT, Rig 3, Abit AN8 Fatal1ty, Opteron 185, 2 X 1024 Corsair PC3200C2PT ATI X1950 XTX Rig 4 Abit UL8 3800 X850 Pro

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •