11-01-2004, 08:32 AM
some more RAM and 3dmark will like you even more.
where did you get the card from greymack?
11-01-2004, 09:25 AM
11-01-2004, 04:38 PM
ahhhhhhhh.....not ebuyer!!!! i detest ebuyer. im still waiting for my broadband router which they have taking the money for which i paid extra to get delivered last tuesday, and all they delivered was a PCI card. a bleeding expensive PCI card for £114. and they dont have phones!!! you have to 'enote' them which is like snail mail its soo slow. since tuesday ive had one reply. just asking what is missing from the consignment.....i told u what was missing becki!!!
go for scan everybdoy and boycott ebuyer!!!
sorry about the rant.
11-01-2004, 07:12 PM
11-02-2004, 08:10 AM
very nice. i expected your 03 score to be higher though. what drivers are u using for that?
11-02-2004, 04:05 PM
11-06-2004, 10:30 AM
I got jealous with all your high scores so i did once major 'overclock' on my card. it was a bit unprofesional though.
11-07-2004, 09:58 AM
how high did you clock it?
11-07-2004, 10:02 AM
the same as i did for this score.
pretty good job is a tricked somebody
11-07-2004, 10:31 AM
you .bmp doesnt work:
when i try to open it w/ photoimpact I get "error when reading the file"
when i open it w/ mspaint, i just get a blank 1024x768 bitmap.
it also is only 106kB big, a 1024x768 bitmap should be 1024x758x(24bit/8bit) = 2359296byte = 2.25MB big.
Last edited by MrBurns; 11-07-2004 at 10:34 AM.
11-07-2004, 02:18 PM
oh sorry didnt load up fully. my networked disconnected before it finished.
11-09-2004, 11:43 AM
Personally I find these new 3dmark benchmarks getting more stupid with every update.
They should be benchmarking computers for TODAY's technology, not future technology. I guess they figure since their name is "Futuremark" that they have to make it for the future.
Watching a benchmark run at 1 to 4fps is not enjoyable, and is nothing but a pain. I can't imagine anyone wanting to buy this program.
To me all it shows is poor code writing for graphics. Just like the 2003 version, I have played games with just as good of graphics that run 1000x better than this so called "benchmark".
It definitely does NOT reflect how well your computer will play modern day games today.
11-09-2004, 02:24 PM
Yeh 3dmark 03 is used to test that.
11-11-2004, 01:24 AM
I think this is doing fine
:-); I think this is pretty decent
Antec Builder series w/trupower 430
Asus p4p800se mobo w/865pe chipset
intel 2.8ghz P4 prescott @800fsb
1 gig of pc2700 cl2.5 running in dual channel (4 sticks 256)
BFGTech 6800oc 128mb non ultra
soundblaster live! 5.1
Dynex 52x CDRW
WD1600 160GB Caviar 7200rpm w/8mb cache
11-11-2004, 12:45 PM
So ure 3dmark 05 score would be???