Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Thunderbird 0.4 Beta Released

  1. #1
    Banned zybch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    2,292

    Thunderbird 0.4 Beta Released

    Why go to all the trouble of creating a new email client? Just about everyone on the face of the planet uses IE or netscrape (for those still living in caves and wearing the badly cured skins of your last meal).
    The Linux 'community' is full of this sort of crud. People who are so short-sighted or bill-gates-hating that they can't see that a wintel solution is far more practical that trying to get stuff to run under linux and still be compatible and able use existing standards.

  2. #2
    Your Friendly Editor
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    82
    Well no one's forcing you to use the "crud." A little healthy competition is good. At the very least it'll keep the e-mail client kings running to make better products so the crud doesn't overtake them. I don't think it is wise to encourage reliance on any one method or company.
    SysOpt's Illustrious Editor

  3. #3
    Senior Member Plaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Posts
    834
    I use Thunderbird and find it much better than OE. I especially like the fact that it doesn't have MSN Messenger tied to it.
    yo trick, why you so **** doofus?

  4. #4
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Mozilla-based stuff is definitely heading in the right direction. It just needs to be slightly more DOM-compliant and support VBScript - then it will be a winner.

    As for thunderbird, it's a lot faster than OE

  5. #5
    Junior Member Z3nN3rd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Safford, Arizona
    Posts
    1

    T-bird

    well, I've been using it for a few days now and find this much better than Outlook or OE for email. It keeps all my many accounts separate and makes it much easier to manage. Much faster than Outlook too. My 2 cents...

  6. #6
    Ultimate Member omendata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh , Scotland , UK
    Posts
    2,617
    Yep its a well designed program.

    Long live the independants!
    This post has been verified as complete b0ll0cks by Microsoft B0ll0ckfilter v1.2344456567 service pack 1001 (c) 2004

    Disclaimer: I apologise in advance if my post is offensive to anyone especially fancyf!

  7. #7
    Junior Member woodchuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2
    Last time Outlook took two minutes to
    boot, I think from the new updates.
    Thunderbird boots in 2 seconds, and
    has the best free spam filter around.
    Also has no trouble with attachnments.
    Very nice code.

  8. #8
    Ultimate Member omendata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh , Scotland , UK
    Posts
    2,617
    Well Ive just found an even better browser - been plkaying with it all day and its increased my productivity 2fold.

    Might even be my program of the year!
    That and virtual pc.

    Its called MyIE2.
    http://www.myie2.com/html_en/home.htm

    Try it - you'll never use another browser!!!!!!!!
    This post has been verified as complete b0ll0cks by Microsoft B0ll0ckfilter v1.2344456567 service pack 1001 (c) 2004

    Disclaimer: I apologise in advance if my post is offensive to anyone especially fancyf!

  9. #9
    Hail to the Victors dajogejr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Metro-Detroit
    Posts
    5,224
    How well does this play with the rest of the Office Suite?

    I personally love my Outlook 2003...

    Woodchuck...
    If your outlook takes 2 minutes to load, I doubt it's the program's fault, I'd look elsewhere.

    I've used Outlook since 97, POP mail, Exhange server and Groupwise email...I can't even say it took that long via dial up to an exchange server...

  10. #10
    Ultimate Member omendata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh , Scotland , UK
    Posts
    2,617
    The main reason for slow startup of outlook or even outlook express are usually the sizes of the database .dbx files and loading the rules for mail!

    Try compacting the folders and removing the gunk!


    http://support.microsoft.com/default...00&Product=oex

    http://support.microsoft.com/default...50&Product=out
    Last edited by omendata; 12-21-2003 at 09:42 PM.
    This post has been verified as complete b0ll0cks by Microsoft B0ll0ckfilter v1.2344456567 service pack 1001 (c) 2004

    Disclaimer: I apologise in advance if my post is offensive to anyone especially fancyf!

  11. #11
    Hail to the Victors dajogejr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Metro-Detroit
    Posts
    5,224
    Only OE uses .dbx files.
    Outlook uses a single .pst file per mail store..

    Unless you're talking Exchange server...

  12. #12
    Ultimate Member omendata's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Edinburgh , Scotland , UK
    Posts
    2,617
    I know - Im an exchange administrator!

    I was merely using it as an example!

    If using outlook with an exchange server there are many reasons for slow performance including site replication , sync with ipaq , corrupt mailbox etc etc etc
    Last edited by omendata; 12-21-2003 at 11:03 PM.
    This post has been verified as complete b0ll0cks by Microsoft B0ll0ckfilter v1.2344456567 service pack 1001 (c) 2004

    Disclaimer: I apologise in advance if my post is offensive to anyone especially fancyf!

  13. #13
    Hail to the Victors dajogejr's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Metro-Detroit
    Posts
    5,224
    Sorry...Omen. Just read that word for word...

    IF he was using Outlook and exhange, I'd try another PC, if they had the preference .prf file set up correctly, that is, and see if it is equally slow...

    They could narrow it down to PC or Exchange server performance there...

  14. #14
    Junior Member woodchuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    2

    now I'm curious....

    Actually I use both Outlook and some
    Mozilla variation regularly. Sure enough
    all the spam filters were slowing down
    load time significantly. Removing all the
    garbage brought the load time down
    to 19 seconds. T-bird is still .5 seconds.

    The Mozilla variations are welcome with my very slow internet connection, sometimes only 26.4 Kbps, then again I've used Netscape since the 2.0 version.
    Thanks for the tip!

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    51
    I use MYIE2 as well... By far the best browser I've ever used.
    Built in ad/content and popup blocking, plugins, extremely good privacy control with cookies etc, undo closing of pages, and recovery of pages visited if your computer for some strange reason crashes. Plus hundreds of other features..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •