Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: AMD, Microsoft Plan for the 64-Bit Desktop

  1. #1
    Member bubbleflap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    London..nodnoL
    Posts
    348

    AMD, Microsoft Plan for the 64-Bit Desktop

    Brilliant! I can't wait to see what kind of a combo this makes....

  2. #2
    Your Friendly Editor
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    82
    I'm interested to see if the general public bites right away or waits until it's a little more embedded across technologies.
    SysOpt's Illustrious Editor

  3. #3
    Ultimate Member rraehal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Denver, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    3,874
    I am not sure it will be a swift movement into the market but I believe it will take at least a small portion. I agree I do not see a need for 4GB of RAM in my current PC's with the computing I do, but it is not far away.

    I would love to have a 64bit system if it will still work with my 16 bit apps. I know the 32bit apps will work. I simply view this like(similar to) going from 486 to Pentium processors.
    -- Mathias

  4. #4
    Ultimate Member iceblue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    hot cali
    Posts
    1,163
    not convincing. dont think everyone with their 32-bit processors are gonna run out and buy 64-bit amd chips cause of that.

  5. #5
    Your Friendly Editor
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    82
    I would love to have a 64bit system if it will still work with my 16 bit apps.
    According to the internetnews.com piece, the 64-bit version of Windows will not support 16-bit apps.
    SysOpt's Illustrious Editor

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Strongsville, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    265
    yay AMD will lead the 64-bit race!
    -Rob Jerina
    System Specs:
    AMD Tbird 1.2ghz 200mhz FSB
    OCZ PC150 256mb SDRAM
    IBM DeskStar 60GXP 60gb 7200rpm
    Hercules ProphetII MX 32MB Dual-Display Video
    Creative SBLive X-Gamer

  7. #7
    Member Avor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Flower Mound, TX
    Posts
    169
    I knew AMD would have to make a deal with the devil to get a lead in something!

    Sounds cool to me ... hopefully this can make things more comptetative against Intel and AMD
    - Avor

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    in my room
    Posts
    15
    i think only one good thing will come from this, cheaper intel cpu prices. i agree we DO NOT need more than 4gb of ram. time to slow down a little, we are going to fast. what's next 128bit?

  9. #9
    Member unfguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    103

    64bit future

    I've only got 1 gig of RAM at this time but I know I could put 4 gigs or more to use.... cost is my limiting factor. Editing video and audio can chew up RAM quickly.... The 64bit world will provide for some great advances but I dont see it in my near future. I'm still waiting for some multi-CPU aware games....

  10. #10
    Senior Member Logan[TeamX]'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    On a 3rd world power grid
    Posts
    669
    Just use a copy of Windows 2000 Server if you need to use more than 4GB of RAM. Buy a server board, add processor, have fun

  11. #11
    Member Duke523's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Beech Grove, IN, USA
    Posts
    404
    So will older game titles run on the 64bit systems.......or is all my old stuff a waste of money now?
    Samsung SyncMaster 2343bwx
    XFX 680i LT
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600
    4x OCZ SLI-Ready DDR2 800MHz 2048MB
    2x eVGA GeForce GTX 465 SC SLI
    Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 ST31000528AS 1TB
    LiteON DH20A3H
    LG GGW-H20L
    LG GSA-H10L
    Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

  12. #12
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    in my room
    Posts
    15
    Originally posted by Duke523
    So will older game titles run on the 64bit systems.......?
    amd says yes.

    intel some say no.

  13. #13
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    AMD 64 means cheaper 32-bit Athlons too.

    It's going to be interesting, and the one thing no one can doubt is that AMD's 64-bit implementation will be more backwards compatible than Intel's.

    That and it may help prove MHz doesn't matter, despite the Netburst Marchitecture.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  14. #14
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    3,723
    Is the ability to address more memory the only advantage of going from 32-bit to 64-bit???

  15. #15
    Member Izdaari's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2000
    Location
    Pacific NW, USA
    Posts
    416
    Not just a MS show either. Apparently 64-bit Linux is ready or almost too, because AMD has been testing the Opteron on it, and the combination is fast. That's the good news. The bad news is it's really slow running on a 32-bit OS (really slow as in outrun by a P4 2.8), so it really does need to the 64-bit to be any good.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •