-
Ultimate Member
Gulf War (RTS)
I have this wild idea. Why don't we ask Blizzard and EA to cooperate together to develop a realistic RTS game. Since the world is 'so happy' with the Second Gulf War, we can create an RTS game that has Iraq and the Coalition forces fighting each other on the desert of Iraq.
In order to make the game more entertaining, we can add some allied forces for each opposing side. The Coalition forces consist of the US and Britain but they will receive limited assistance from Australia, Spain and Portugal. On Iraq, it will receive limited assistance from all the terrorist groups.
The Coalition will possess Tomahawk Storm while Iraq will possess Apocalypse. The former will consist of fifty Tomahawk missiles bombing their designated target. The latter will consist of ten biological-based missiles attacking the Coalition troops.
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
-
Ultimate Member
I just remembered. We'll forsake all the futuristic weapons and concentrate on our current weapons. That will make the RTS game more realistic. We'll add in a few CNN-based news clips in the game to make it like the players are commanding their troops to battle. Graphics wise! Up to the developers!
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
-
Senior Member
I'd rather have another expansion pack for Ghost Recon.
-
Ultimate Member
Wat? FPS? Man! U are missing the whole game. We can become the real-life commanders during the war. We can even be 'inside' the war.
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
-
-
Ultimate Member
I tot most of you like to eradicate Iraq? We can vent our frustration on the game because we're not there fighting. You know! There are a lot of 'warmongers' here so this game is gonna be a hit.
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
-
Senior Member
I think it is a good idea. But I would rather have it be FPS. Easier to "vent our frustration" on a character that looks real, and whose head explodes realistically, rather than little dudes running around a map.
-
Ultimate Member
Yeah if the war is really cool then someone will have to release a game probably wont until after the war though.
-
Only if there is a scenario where someone attacks Israel and the whole world resorts to carnage.
Talk about realism.
-
Ultimate Member
Realism...
Wow! Add Israel? I think as a neutral state?
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
-
Ultimate Member
Nah bf 1942 has some good mods for that.. I know it is a fps
Lost 10,000 miles from home and loving it!!
-
Ultimate Member
But that is WW2. Ancient history, man! We're talking about now.
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
-
Senior Member
Like the Idea (like RTS) but Apocalypase for the attack name sounds to me like it would get to be a anoying name after while. IMO
Tech^
-
As long as you could play the role of the bad guy; lie, cheat, steal, smuggle, work drug deals with France/Germany/Russia, bribe hippie peace activists to use human shields.
I'd buy it.
-
Ultimate Member
Not bad, man! This game will make big bucks if it is made into a 100% realistic RTS game.
Give a man a fish
It will feed him for a day
Give a man a fishing rod
It will feed him forever
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|