Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Nvidia To Release New GPUs

  1. #1
    Senior Member Witch-Talon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hamster cage
    Posts
    558

    Nvidia To Release New GPUs

    Down with HOOVER!!! Up with Newer, Quieter, and Cooler GFX!!!!

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member chubtub's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Twin Cities, MN
    Posts
    1,393
    Woot more price drops so my poor **** can afford a new card. I just hope that they are not gimck cards like that of the MX models.

  3. #3
    Senior Member tony_j15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    A galaxy far, far away...
    Posts
    620
    I'm guessing the 5200 and 5600 are redone Gforce4's comparable to the ti4200 and 4600 but DX9 compatible.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Witch-Talon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hamster cage
    Posts
    558
    $100 for 5200? Something don't sound right. (Even if 5200 are a DX9.0 verison of GF4200) Why would they sell it cheaper than most GF4200 series?

  5. #5
    Ultimate Member Strawbs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    4,706
    I think nVidia are losing the race, they need to get the FX name out there, and nobodies gonna pay big bucks for a chip that sucks as much as it blows.

  6. #6
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    They're a completely new architecture, based on the FX core.

    HardOCP should have benchmarks up by Monday, so you know where I'm going to be pointing my browser.

    They look good, and it will be interesting to compare them to ATI's new 9600 series as they seem to have a very similar design. At least as similar as you can get from NV30 vs RV350.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  7. #7
    Junior Member rochacarlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    antioch, ca
    Posts
    11
    anyone know how fast the fx 5200 going to be compared to a ti4200 and a radeon 9500 pro?

    i am looking for a new video card.

  8. #8
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    I don't know, but I expect the FX5200 to be slower than both.

    I would expect it to come out near the Gf3/Radeon 8500 in performance.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  9. #9
    Member Pentium4Guy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Between heaven and hell
    Posts
    65
    I hate to correct you,

    But the FX runs much faster then the G4's.Slightly faster then the 9700's look it up i dont lie.

    -P4
    Pentium 4 2.4gig 533 FSB
    Soyo P4X400 Soyo dragoon platinum mobo
    1.5 GIGS DDR 333
    Sound Blaster audigy 5.1
    Neon blue Digital 8
    Lite-On 48X burner
    Lite-On 16X DVD player
    Dual 80 GIG ATA 133 WD hard drives(8.9 ms seek time)
    *Raid to Raid*
    Geforce 4 Ti 4600
    Black 3.5 sony floppy

    CUSTOM CASE THAT WOULD MAKE GEORGE LUCAS DROOL!

    ~Intel Inside~

  10. #10
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    Ahh Pentium4Guy.

    You're right if you are describing the GfFX 5800 Ultra. It's a little faster than the Radeon 9700.

    However, I was referring to the GfFX 5200 built on the NV34 core and the slowest variant of the GfFX. I expect that card to have similar performance to the Gf3 or Radeon 8500. I doubt it will match the Ti4200 in raw performance.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  11. #11
    Senior Member Witch-Talon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    Hamster cage
    Posts
    558
    unfortunately Radeon 9700 smokes GF 5800 at full eye candy. And preformance+cost+noise+heat goes to ATI. Much better overall for ATI than Nvidia.

    Originally posted by Pentium4Guy
    I hate to correct you,

    But the FX runs much faster then the G4's.Slightly faster then the 9700's look it up i dont lie.

    -P4

  12. #12
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Yep,

    and considering it's on the shelves and takes up only one PCI slot is an added plus.

    For its horsepower, I consider the 9700 very, very inexpensive.

  13. #13
    Senior Member tking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    www.kingdomta.com
    Posts
    702
    From the HardOCP review of the FX cards:

    "...we have seen first hand that the current GeForceFX product line simply cannot compete with ATI products released last year"

    ... ouch.

  14. #14
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    Exactly

    And I've seen similar results elswhere though I think the [H] had the best review.

    I am very glad I got a 9500 Pro last month.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  15. #15
    Senior Member tking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    www.kingdomta.com
    Posts
    702
    I was hoping the FX's would leapfrog the 9700 like the 9700 leapfrogged the 4600. Instead it looks like Nvidia is reduced to playing games with image quality just to get decent frame rates.

    Next gen they ain't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •