Page 64 of 82 FirstFirst ... 14 54 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 74 ... LastLast
Results 946 to 960 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. #946
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    5
    yeah i don't think i'll OC my system for a while now. it runs like a charm

    nice score by the way

  2. #947
    Ultimate Member porsch1909's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,121
    you are ****ting me you got an X800 pro and now a 6800 ultra already im not rich enough for this. why didnt you get the X800 XT PE. its a lot better in most test ive read.

  3. #948
    Senior Member chriswhitelaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    U.S.A. !
    Posts
    776

    your opinions on this?

    well after upgrading the processor,the memory and the vid card I would like to know what you guys/gals think

    P4 2.0A@2.36ghz
    512mb PC2700
    ATI 9600XT 128mb

    3DMARK2003 build 340

    score: 3597

    before upgrading

    Intel Celeron 2.5@3.0ghz
    512mb PC2100
    Xtasy TI4600 128mb

    3DMARK2003 build 340

    score: 1187
    the prince of all saiyans will not fall again!

  4. #949
    Ultimate Member porsch1909's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,121
    Its a significant improvment

  5. #950
    Hooya! Rabbitrunner51's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Somewhere in time
    Posts
    6,129
    Makes me feel a bit better with my score..which is actually good considering I do not overclock or anything....

    P4 2.8C 800FSB
    Asus P4P800 Deluxe Mobo
    Corsair XMS series twinx PC3200 ultra low latency Platinum 2-3-2-6 timings ( 1 GB memory)
    EGVA FX 5900 video card
    Audigy 2 ZS sound card
    Creative Z7700 7.1 speaker system

    3D Mark 03 ( no video card AA and AF on ) program defaults at 4X AA

    score : 5830
    Phenom 2 X4 B35 :ASRock N68C-S UCC: G Skill DDR1333 ( 4GB ): ATI Radeon HD6770 1GB : Logitech X504 5.1 SS speakers.:WD 500GB,&300GB Sata2 HD's ; Liteon Lightscribe 24X DVD/combo Drive : Antec 620C neo PSU: CTL 22"WS

  6. #951
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    Originally posted by porsch1909
    Its a significant improvment
    althought in most games the difference will be smaller.

    in dx8 games, the ti4600 is usually even fatser than any radeon 9600, but your new cpu is faster, so the performance could be the same as before in dx8-games.

  7. #952
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    Originally posted by MrBurns
    althought in most games the difference will be smaller.

    in dx8 games, the ti4600 is usually even fatser than any radeon 9600
    In the majority of casers a 9600 XT (or Pro for that matter) is faster (IMO not enough to warrant the purchase though - the R9800 Pro woudl have represented better value for money)than a Ti4600, even in DX8 applications.

    http://www20.graphics.tomshardware.c...ournament_2003
    http://www20.graphics.tomshardware.c...charts-04.html
    http://www20.graphics.tomshardware.c...charts-08.html

    etc.

    --Jakk

  8. #953
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    but you see, that the difference is not big between the ti4600 and the r9800 in dx8 games, or would you call 3fps in ut2003 and 7fps in generals big? ok, in bf1942 the differenc is a little bigger, but this is only in this one dx8 game.

    about the 9600xt: if i would have the time, i would be able to find enough benchmarks, where the 9600xt is slower than the ti4600. i dont know, which is better on average, but when you compare the normal 9600, it is slower than the ti4600 in most dx8-games. if i would have the time for it, i would search for benchmarks to prove what i posted.

    i have seen one benchmark of the ti4600 in hl2 (or was it doom3?), where it had even better framrates than the r980 w/ the dx8-rendering-path. and the r9800 had more fps w/ the dx8-path than w/ all dx9-paths, probably because some details require dx9.

  9. #954
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    Originally posted by MrBurns
    but you see, that the difference is not big between the ti4600 and the r9800 in dx8 games, or would you call 3fps in ut2003 and 7fps in generals big? ok, in bf1942 the differenc is a little bigger, but this is only in this one dx8 game.
    I didnt say the gap was particular big (indeed, if you'll look above you'll see i explicitly state the fact that the gap is small), however, it is a gap none the less.

    i have seen one benchmark of the ti4600 in hl2 (or was it doom3?), where it had even better framrates than the r980 w/ the dx8-rendering-path. and the r9800 had more fps w/ the dx8-path than w/ all dx9-paths, probably because some details require dx9.
    It wont have been doom 3 as it doesnt have any direct X renders (its an Open GL game - though given Nvidia's Open GL strength and the somewhat 'remarkable' nature of the preliminary D3 benchmarks, i wouldnt be suprised to see the ti4600 beating the 9600XT) and in HL2, (pre-NV40) Nvidia cards are extremely performance limited (paticularly in the full DX9/SM2.0 path)

    The speed of theTi4600 in HL2 DX8 path:

    http://www4.tomshardware.com/busines...f-life-03.html

    is equal to that of the R9600 Pro in the [B]DX9[B] path.

    In that particular game its pointless making a comparison between the two cards DX8 performance, because the 9600XT owner can enjoy it in its full DX9 goodness at the same speed a Ti4600 user gets the Dx8 experience at.

    As for using benchmarks ot prove a point, they were simply the first DX8 benchmarks i found, and the only one in which the ti4600 holds a speed advantage of any kind is in WC3: Frozen Throne, and even then its less than 1FPS.

    --Jakk

  10. #955
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    Originally posted by Bigjakkstaffa
    [B]Ihttp://www4.tomshardware.com/busines...f-life-03.html

    is equal to that of the R9600 Pro in the [B]DX9 path.
    I dont see any benchmarks of ati cards on your link.

  11. #956
    Senior Member PacNW CE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Portland
    Posts
    628
    Radeon 9800 Pro 128 (OC 412/750)
    Barton XP 2500+ @ 2800+
    MSI K7N2 Ultra L
    2x 256 PC 2700 Dual Channel


    6012 3dmark03
    Just A Curb Side Profit

  12. #957
    Ultimate Member porsch1909's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,121
    I heard somewhere that doom 3 supports HT technology is this true, does anybody know???

  13. #958
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    Originally posted by porsch1909
    I heard somewhere that doom 3 supports HT technology is this true, does anybody know???
    i only read somewhere, that there will be an amd64 version. i know, hl2 will have an amd64 version.

  14. #959
    Ultimate Member porsch1909's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,121
    yeh but is there much point in that if the windows 64 isnt out yet??

  15. #960
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    Originally posted by MrBurns
    I dont see any benchmarks of ati cards on your link.
    Forgot the second link:

    http://www4.tomshardware.com/busines...on_performance

    --Jakk

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •