POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

**rochacarlos** · 02-12-2003, 07:43 PM

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=61546

**rochacarlos** · 02-13-2003, 02:29 AM

^bump

**Rugor** · 02-13-2003, 02:43 AM

I've run the new 3D Mark and it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

It was a huge download, and didn't run all that well on my system. Yes my score was respectable, mostly because I do have a DX 9 class video card, but the experience of sitting there watching the demo through wasn't. It stuttered and the framerate dropped al the way down to 1 in places.

Despite that I got 3217 which is pretty good, at least compared to many systems out there.

But for this huge download-- I got much less functionality than in 3DMark2001SE. I can't save to a text file, so I can see my results properly for myself. I can't even change the resolution, or select tests not to run. In 2001 I could deselect the tests my Gf2MX couldn't run for a better comparison of simple speed against the Radeon 9500 Pro (I know the 9500 Pro owns it).

I can't do that in 03.

It's much less than I expected, especially after all the hype. All it needed was an FX Flow cooling system to make it perfect.

**XtReAmTwEaKist** · 02-13-2003, 07:30 AM

rochacarlos, my comp rocked your system lol by like 200 point and your proc is 500+ megahertz faster LMAO proves intel sucks a fat one only thing you beat me in was cpu testing oh well ATi and AMD all the way

**causticVapor** · 02-13-2003, 03:21 PM

Originally posted by XtReAmTwEaKist
STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333

Hey, hey, hey chill.

Gib is nowhere near deservant of being called a stupid-***.

Drunk, sir, I presume?

**Beeblequix** · 02-13-2003, 03:44 PM

1550 3dmarks.

I ran it at 5:40 AM before I came to work. I couln't upload the file, as the servers were probably way over-flogged. Later on I'll post a compare URL.

I think the real reason Nvidia hates it is that it's a DX 9 bench and they don't have any DX 9 cards out yet. Seeing as I've yet to see a GfFX for sale anywhere, it doesn't really exist yet.

I couldn't have stated it better myself.

I was thinking this exact sentiment in traffic today.

Nvidia abandoned Futuremark's ship in December because they knew their FX wasn't even close to ready to compete with Radeons today. They of course wouldn't admit defeat, so instead pulled a liberal maneuver and attacked Futuremark, stating their benchmarking tool is "inefficient" in its vertex shader engine. Then there's Nvidia not putting their FX card on the market. This just tells me that Nvidia lost this round, and it's not Futuremarks' fault.

ßeeßlevidia

**causticVapor** · 02-13-2003, 04:35 PM

nvidia and AMD could both be accused of spewing massive amounts of the familiar

F, U, D.

lately.

**XtReAmTwEaKist** · 02-13-2003, 06:09 PM

F, U, D ? and caustic i was playing but still that post was BS i can only run one game with my 7500 and i get like 900 points but explain the F U D

**Beeblequix** · 02-14-2003, 12:03 PM

ran again. 1555. Made 1 small sound card related tweak (to where it should be) and got my lousy 5 point increase.

STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333

rochacarlos, my comp rocked your system lol by like 200 point and your proc is 500+ megahertz faster LMAO proves intel sucks a fat one only thing you beat me in was cpu testing oh well ATi and AMD all the way

Do you think you could show a bit more respect here? Seriously.

ß

**maje87c** · 02-14-2003, 01:36 PM

it does make a person wonder just how much money ATi payed futuremark to release 3dMark03

**AllGamer** · 02-14-2003, 01:45 PM

well if they did they didn't pay enough the

cuz even ATI runs pretty **** slow in 3DMarks03

so i'll say 3DMarks03 is really a fair bench testing software for new PCs

**XtReAmTwEaKist** · 02-14-2003, 07:15 PM

yea i was out of line B but still lmao....... he posted a 02, with a 7500 thats funny

**benknobi** · 02-14-2003, 07:31 PM

XP2100+ Tbred "B"@2286Mhz, PNY GF4 Ti4400@308/661 gets me .... 1734 3D'03 Marks.

Pretty pictures... sort of meaningless otherwise.

**Giblet Plus!** · 02-15-2003, 01:02 AM

3dmark 03 doesn't like my setup. Since I have a 64mb card, I get stutters every few seconds as textures are swapped into my card.

I won't even post my score. . .

**Giblet Plus!** · 02-15-2003, 01:38 AM

Has anyone with a geforce 4 tried the new 42.68s?

Here's the link.

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Posting Permissions