POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

**Budafooko** · 11-21-2003, 01:48 PM

So here's my system

Asus P4c800 mobo w/inegrated sound
2.4 @ 2.53 P4/800 fsb
FX5600u/ 128mb
1g ddr

My scores stay around 1600. i'm thinking this is a little low. AA and all that jazz is off and i've got the latest drivers.

**Beast_USA** · 11-21-2003, 04:08 PM

Originally posted by Budafooko
So here's my system

Asus P4c800 mobo w/inegrated sound
2.4 @ 2.53 P4/800 fsb
FX5600u/ 128mb
1g ddr

My scores stay around 1600. i'm thinking this is a little low. AA and all that jazz is off and i've got the latest drivers.

What OS?
which drivers?
52.16 DX9-9b?....the 5175's seem to score better below the 5800's. (if you are using 52.16's you need to re-install dx9 after the drivers)
That seems way to low for that system....you should be hitting high 4's low 5's at stock clock on the 5600.

Nice system

**Budafooko** · 11-21-2003, 05:59 PM

I'm running XP w/ service pack 1

I am using 52.16 drivers so i reinstalled DX9.0b and that gave me about 100 more marks, but nothing big. I ran 3dmark 2001se and aqua mark too, they both pretty much suck too. 2001 got 8000 marks

and auqa mark got 16,700, which i guess is low for my configuration.

**fishybawb** · 11-21-2003, 06:13 PM

What make card is it Budafooko?

**Beast_USA** · 11-21-2003, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by Budafooko
I'm running XP w/ service pack 1

I am using 52.16 drivers so i reinstalled DX9.0b and that gave me about 100 more marks, but nothing big. I ran 3dmark 2001se and aqua mark too, they both pretty much suck too. 2001 got 8000 marks and auqa mark got 16,700, which i guess is low for my configuration.

Do you have lots of things running in XP? (right click my computer...click properties....then advanced tab...performance setting.....you can turn a bunch of that junk off) that should bump your speed up.
Screen savers, windows themes running?

Are you oc'ing the FX and who's FX?....mines oc'ed

Here's a link everyone here is using nvidia cards.
http://forum.oc-forums.com/vb/forumd...ne=&forumid=86

All oc'ed nvidia cards
http://forum.oc-forums.com/vb/showth...hreadid=137421

My aqua mark is 55000+ 2001 20000+ you shouldn't be that far behind me. Those scores are to low for you I hope one of these lniks can help. There are some pretty smart people over there.

**Budafooko** · 11-21-2003, 07:14 PM

The card is a gainward ultra/760 tv/dvi, not overclocked. Thanks for the links, i'll see if i can't find something.

**Budafooko** · 11-22-2003, 01:10 AM

Ok, so a word to the wise: When gainward puts the word "Ultra" in the name, it doesn't mean the card is an ultra. Looked it up on the internet since it doesn't say anywhere on the box. It's just the regular version with 5.0ns ram running at 275/550. that could explain things a little

**Death To Mel** · 11-23-2003, 01:25 AM

OK I have a story for you. First off I installed the latest drivers for my Radeon 9800XT and got 3160 in the bench. OF COURSE I wasn't happy about this so I downloaded and installed the catalyst 3.9 drivers from ati site AND MY BENCH IS: 5988

Not too shabby here's the details:
GT1 - wings of fury: 156.3
GT2 - Battle of proxycon: 45.0
GT3 - troll's lair: 38.0
GT4 - mother nature: 36.1
CPU TEST 1: 47.8
CPU TEST 2: 8.6 (LOL)
Fill Rate (single-texturing) 1828.1
Fill Rate (Multi-texturing) 2820.8
vertex shader: 19.8
pixel shader: 52.4
Ragtroll: 28.8
Sound: no sounds:30.8
24 sounds:27.8
60 sounds:25.6

3dmark03 setup:
All tests selected
Res: 1024*768
AA: none
Texture filtering: Optimal
Max Anisotropy: 4
Vertex shaders: optimal

MY COMPUTER
Abit NF7-S
Asus Radeon 9800XT
Soundblaster audigy gamer
512 stick of pc-2100
Athlon XP 2400+

NOTHING IN MY SYSTEM IS OVERCLOCKED ALL STOCK SPEEDS.

Note: Very happy with my results here didn't look through all the posts to see if was the highest though... also my system need to be redone if that has any effect on things...i dunno.

So yeah ((((((5988))))))

**MrBurns** · 11-23-2003, 02:30 AM

Originally posted by Death To Mel
CPU TEST 2: 8.6 (LOL)

Its normal, that you get low FPS in the second CPU test. I had 635 CPU-marks on my Athlon XP 2700+@3000+ (13.5x178) and I alos only had 12.7FPS in the second CPU-test (but 62.3 in the first). If anyone askes, whey I dont use a higher FSB: this clock speeed is not final, it was w/ my old cheap PC2700 memory. I am still testing the max. stable oc w/ my new memory.

Btw, what is your overall CPU-score?

**jonwes** · 11-23-2003, 04:48 AM

3DMark03: 5,289

System:

Athlon XP 2000 (not oc'd)
BFG Asylun FX 5900 non-ultra (451/921)
1 GB PC2700 333Mhz RAM
Samsung 160GB 2MB HDD
Windows XP Pro SP1
Allied 400W PSU
Epox 8K3A+ MB

I'm happy with the results, but I think a faster processor and FSB would improve things dramatically. . .

**MrBurns** · 11-23-2003, 05:02 AM

Originally posted by jonwes
I'm happy with the results, but I think a faster processor and FSB would improve things dramatically. . .

But you would also need a better mobo. Your mobo has a VIA KT333 chipset, which sucks.

I would recommend getting a Athlon64 because you will soon need 64bit: a 64bit version of the or UT2003 will be released as soon as the 64bit version of Windows, which will be probably in the second quater of 2004 and Epic announced, that in 2005 they will release a game only for 64bit CPUs and I am sure, that other manufacturers will follow Epic soon.

If you cannot aford an Athlon64 system, I would recommend the Epox 8rda3+ which officially supports the 200MHz FSB and can be oced very good.

**Beast_USA** · 11-23-2003, 06:09 AM

I'm with MrBurns on that 64 ...my next up grade I will be going back to amd.

In another forum (pcpitstop) in the pit test my P4 3.2@4000 mhz is only 19 pt's in front of a 64@2400 mhz. Man 1600 mhz to beat his score...OUCH.

**MrBurns** · 11-23-2003, 06:15 AM

Originally posted by Beast_USA
I'm with MrBurns on that 64 ...my next up grade I will be going back to amd.

In another forum (pcpitstop) in the pit test my P4 3.2@4000 mhz is only 19 pt's in front of a 64@2400 mhz. Man 1600 mhz to beat his score...OUCH.

I have seen a guy, which oced his Athlon64 3200+ from 2000MHz to 2530MHz (using water cooling):
http://www.nethands.de/pys/show.php4?user=DJMich

On Tomshardware they even oced an Athlon64 FX-51 from 2.2GHz to 2.8GHz (using compressor cooling):
http://www6.tomshardware.com/cpu/200...cooler-05.html

**Beast_USA** · 11-23-2003, 06:32 AM

He's using 3200+ & water glad he can't hit 2530

The fx-51 is the one I want....but just did this one two weeks ago.
Maybe in three months or so.

those 64's are smokers!

My aquamark is 55979 at 3609 HT turned on ......5950 cranked to the gill.

**MrBurns** · 11-23-2003, 06:37 AM

Originally posted by Beast_USA
He's using 3200+ & water glad he can't hit 2530

Do you mean the guy on pcpitstop?

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

FX 5900

Re: FX 5900

Posting Permissions