Page 36 of 82 FirstFirst ... 26 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 46 ... LastLast
Results 526 to 540 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. 10-04-2003, 04:15 PM #526
    Ammok
    Ammok is offline
    I got pie!!! Ammok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Stoke.UK
    Posts
    4,589
    Using Cat7 got 2850 up from 2401 cat6 at stock, no oc. ATi 9600 non pro.
    Life is a bowl of cherries
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 10-07-2003, 08:25 PM #527
    Andiesean
    Andiesean is offline
    Member Andiesean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    46
    3D Marks 2003: 4251 marks

    ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
    P4 2.4
    1GB PC2700 DDR

    at default settings
    ASUS P4S8X
    P4 2.4GHz
    ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
    SoundBlaster Live 5.1
    Creative Inspire 5.1
    WD 120 GB HDD
    1GB PC2700
    TDK VeloCD 48x CDRW
    Lite On DVD Rom
    Antec SX1040BII case w/ 400w PSU
    Windows XP Home
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 10-08-2003, 12:38 AM #528
    ComPooTer
    ComPooTer is offline
    Ultimate Member ComPooTer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Concord, California
    Posts
    1,252
    wow my oc'ed radeon 9600 pro is almost up to par with that 9700 pro!!!1

    3dmark03 w/ (513/340.20): 4059
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 10-08-2003, 05:11 AM #529
    bblqj78
    bblqj78 is offline
    Ultimate Member bblqj78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,187
    Andiesean...

    Thats a pretty low score for ur system....go into driver settings...advanced settings and make sure everything is set to performance. On my exact same system I get 5000 points...everything at standard speeds. I have overclocked my 9700pro (pushing it a bit more every so often) and am getting near 5700 3dmarks (simialar to 9800pro scores at default speeds).
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 10-08-2003, 11:22 AM #530
    Uisge
    Uisge is offline
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    3
    Pentium IV 3.0GHz
    2 x 512MB Twinmos 400DDR
    Radeon 9800Pro 128MB
    Catalyst 3.7 (driver set to stable, not to performance)
    ASUS P4C800 deluxe
    WD 120GB 8MB
    Audigy 2
    DirectX9.0b
    Win XP -SP1

    With -now and then- framerates <10 FPS

    3DMark2003: 5390

    Will test it also with driver set to performance and vsync off as suggested by CWIN (tnx, by the way).

    3DMark2003: 5427 (all tabs on performance, vsync was off during both benchmarks by the way)
    Last edited by Uisge; 10-08-2003 at 04:55 PM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 10-08-2003, 11:25 AM #531
    cwin
    cwin is offline
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Jersey, UK
    Posts
    1,850
    Originally posted by Uisge
    (driver set to stable, not to performance)
    3DMark2003: 5390
    Very good score (for the settings). Try setting everything to performance in the direct3d section, and disabling vsync
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 10-08-2003, 11:26 AM #532
    cwin
    cwin is offline
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Jersey, UK
    Posts
    1,850
    Originally posted by Mm9004
    I got 1,000,000,000
    Welcome to the club
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 10-08-2003, 01:40 PM #533
    TiGgErDbC
    TiGgErDbC is offline
    Senior Member TiGgErDbC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    677
    hmmm scary i didnt change my performance tab there set to the middle and i got 5390 with a 9800 NP just oced... :\

    i'll go re-benchmark
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 10-08-2003, 06:06 PM #534
    ComPooTer
    ComPooTer is offline
    Ultimate Member ComPooTer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Concord, California
    Posts
    1,252
    i got 1 point on 3dmark03

    current set up

    radeon 9800 pro
    200 mhz CPU
    64mb SDRAM

    i cant seem to figure out the problem!!!






    im kidding
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 10-08-2003, 06:12 PM #535
    cwin
    cwin is offline
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Jersey, UK
    Posts
    1,850
    Originally posted by ComPooTer
    i got 1 point on 3dmark03

    current set up

    radeon 9800 pro
    200 mhz CPU
    64mb SDRAM

    i cant seem to figure out the problem!!!
    try a defrag
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 10-08-2003, 08:55 PM #536
    TiGgErDbC
    TiGgErDbC is offline
    Senior Member TiGgErDbC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    677
    2.1 amd
    512 166
    9800 NP 417/317
    raid 0
    gigabyte 7vaxp

    5693

    cat 3.7 lol and the 3.8's JUST came out :|
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 10-08-2003, 10:13 PM #537
    Magua
    Magua is offline
    Ultimate Member Magua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Cape Cod, Mass
    Posts
    1,609
    Don't expect much from the Cat 3.8, atleast from a synthetic benchmark point of view.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 10-08-2003, 10:51 PM #538
    Rugor
    Rugor is offline
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    However, I find NWN looks nicer under Cat 3.8 than 3.6 (I d'led the 3.7's but never bothered to install them).
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 10-08-2003, 11:50 PM #539
    ComPooTer
    ComPooTer is offline
    Ultimate Member ComPooTer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Concord, California
    Posts
    1,252
    is it just me or what, i installed the 3.8 drivers and i couldve sworn the image quality improved even more, i was like woww
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 10-09-2003, 12:18 AM #540
    Magua
    Magua is offline
    Ultimate Member Magua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Cape Cod, Mass
    Posts
    1,609
    quite possibly, haven't played any games since installing. Anyone who hasen't installed yet wanna take some before/after screenies?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules