Page 3 of 82 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. 02-12-2003, 12:44 AM #31
    Giblet Plus!
    Giblet Plus! is offline
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Originally posted by AlexGee


    Holy sh&% Giblet! 172 kbs!! wooo hooo1 Thank you, thank you, thank you
    Found the link at the overclockers.com forum.

    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 02-12-2003, 12:54 AM #32
    AlexGee
    AlexGee is offline
    Senior Member AlexGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    604
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=28325
    Last edited by AlexGee; 02-12-2003 at 01:36 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 02-12-2003, 01:03 AM #33
    smelanson
    smelanson is offline
    Senior Member smelanson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Shubenacadie NS, CAN
    Posts
    770
    1550
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=26608

    Syetem
    =====

    Pentium IV 2.4GHz@ 2.7GHz
    Geforce IV Ti4200 128Mb @ 275/500
    768Mb DDR333
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 02-12-2003, 01:17 AM #34
    Giblet Plus!
    Giblet Plus! is offline
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Originally posted by AlexGee
    4951! Yea baby. 5000 here I come . . .
    http://service.futuremark.com/servle...projectmanager
    That's your project url. We need the compare url.

    9700, I'm guessing?
    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 02-12-2003, 01:25 AM #35
    XtReAmTwEaKist
    XtReAmTwEaKist is offline
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 02-12-2003, 01:26 AM #36
    XtReAmTwEaKist
    XtReAmTwEaKist is offline
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    oh yeah the cards at stock speed 275/275 cant OC without better core cooling and heatsinks for mem i'll get'em soon PSST 9700 pro in the mail
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 02-12-2003, 01:35 AM #37
    AlexGee
    AlexGee is offline
    Senior Member AlexGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    604
    Sorry.

    5006!

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=28325

    2100+@2210 mhz (12.5 x 177), ASUS a7n8x, ATI 9500 non-pro (modded to 9700 pro)
    Last edited by AlexGee; 02-12-2003 at 01:40 AM.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 02-12-2003, 01:50 AM #38
    Benssax
    Benssax is offline
    Senior Member Benssax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    AL,USA
    Posts
    909
    3dmark 03 must love radeon 9700's
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 02-12-2003, 02:34 AM #39
    AllGamer
    AllGamer is offline
    Ultimate Member AllGamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    16,305

    Default Everything

    No OC, no nothing (factory default)

    935

    Performance setting 985

    Maxed Quality everything 895

    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 02-12-2003, 08:38 AM #40
    DesertPony
    DesertPony is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    122
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=29427

    I used to think my system was god. Now it's been reduced to nothing.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  11. 02-12-2003, 11:06 AM #41
    omega31
    omega31 is offline
    Ultimate Member omega31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    So. Cal. USA
    Posts
    2,380
    Originally posted by Giblet Plus!
    Downloading at 100 k/s here.
    If you're here for the 3dMark03 download, you've missed out. We want to thank everyone who helped us destroy some bandwidth and spread that 3dMark love.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  12. 02-12-2003, 12:20 PM #42
    zergboy5
    zergboy5 is offline
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    136
    Uhg, my system is compleatly video card bound with a result of:

    1050

    Sys:
    Athlon XP 1700
    512 MB PC 2100
    Radeon 8500 with 3.0 drivers
    Audigy 2
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  13. 02-12-2003, 12:36 PM #43
    Bigjakkstaffa
    Bigjakkstaffa is offline
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    lol - apparently nvidia are claiming thers a fault wit 3dmark 2003 and nvidia cards giving an incorrect figure. Theres a link to it from www.actiontrip.com

    --Jakk
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  14. 02-12-2003, 01:52 PM #44
    germanjulian
    germanjulian is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,185
    i mean comon the FPS we get show that we should get a low scare.

    for the space fighting demo my FPS where around 5!!! yes 5

    i given up now. this it it. my next computer will not be a gaming rig, i will buy a cheap no power 3dcard.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  15. 02-12-2003, 01:56 PM #45
    germanjulian
    germanjulian is offline
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,185
    and why is mother nature not supported on my machine??

    what is that?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules