-
07-20-2003, 10:42 PM
#346
4250 on 2003 with my 64mb radeon 9500 non pro. Not too bad - no checkerboarding which is nice. Not far behind the 9700 non pro i have downstairs.
16000+ on 3dmark 2001
i got this when i ONCE managed to clock the mem on my card up to 330 with no repercussions... unfortunately these days it gives up around 315 with nasty artifacts.
Still, not too bad for a 64mb
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6742837
highest I got with current settings:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6751827
thought i'd post these again as the radeon comparisons are being asked for
-
07-21-2003, 07:26 PM
#347
I got 1377.
Athlon xp 2000 poly
gf4 visiontek ti4200
512mb crucial ddr2700
Christopher
-
07-21-2003, 08:51 PM
#348
Better scores
Now I have score of 5673 for my 3D Mark for a 3.0GHz P4 with 9800 Raedeon. Let me know if there is better result without overclocking.
-
07-22-2003, 12:04 AM
#349
How do you access a saved score on your computer? When I click on it it asks me wich program I want to open it with.
Thanks,
Christopher
-
07-22-2003, 10:46 AM
#350
Ultimate Member
Depends on the file type you saved it as. It mite has been .htm, then use IE to open it.
-
07-22-2003, 11:44 AM
#351
I got pie!!!
sevenbeansalad, thats really poor, I got 2500 with an ati 9600, you should be able to beat mine. Make sure you got the latest nvidia drivers.
Life is a bowl of cherries
-
07-22-2003, 12:56 PM
#352
Ultimate Member
Not really bad at all. At a time When I still had a GeForce4Ti4200/128 installed along with PC2100 and a PalominoXP2000+, I was getting about the same as him (1409 at stock). What really helped was the WindowsXP Services Axe-'em Guide and a certain Nvidia driver named 40.72. What should help him a lot would be to unlock the cpu (if it is a Palomino or his mobo can't auto-unlock the cpu if it is a T-Bred) and lower the multiplier and raise the fsb to 166 since he has PC2700.
Last edited by x51out; 07-22-2003 at 12:59 PM.
-
07-22-2003, 01:30 PM
#353
Doesnt look to bad for a ti4200 that, up the cire and memory frequencies a bit and set about overclocking the CPU to push up into the high 1000 range
--Jakk
-
07-22-2003, 02:09 PM
#354
I got pie!!!
yes, my mistake, I was thinking the 4200 normally beats my 9600 in 2001 benchmarks, but the 2003 ones are not comparable due to the driver optimiation thingys. Sorry.
For non nvidia peeps here is my latest 9600 2003 marks 2947 (and for sevenbeansalad, it only gets 10,712 on 2001 which is the better comparison as i do not think the 2003 marks let you compare nvidia and ati cards very well))
Life is a bowl of cherries
-
07-23-2003, 04:46 AM
#355
I got 1900 marks
Asus P4P800
P4 2.4 @ 2.978 640FBS (does not go higher i have Revision C1)
256x2 DDR2700, 333 DUAL
MSI GeForce4 ti4800SE
Is it good for my PC ?
-
07-23-2003, 07:08 AM
#356
Ultimate Member
nameless....
thats pretty good for a GF4.......you wont get much higher in 2003 without a DX9 card...!
-
07-23-2003, 07:08 AM
#357
Ultimate Member
nameless....
thats pretty good for a GF4.......you wont get much higher in 2003 without a DX9 card...!
-
07-23-2003, 02:40 PM
#358
Originally posted by NameLess
I got 1900 marks
Asus P4P800
P4 2.4 @ 2.978 640FBS (does not go higher i have Revision C1)
256x2 DDR2700, 333 DUAL
MSI GeForce4 ti4800SE
Is it good for my PC ?
Seems a bit low to me given the fact i scored 1950 on a ti4200 64mb (280/300), Xp2400+ @ 2.31Ghz and 512mb PC2700 Cl2.5 @ 171Mhz FSB
You might wanna overclock your gfx card, see if that bumps it up any
--Jakk
-
07-23-2003, 03:49 PM
#359
Seems i can't get more than that from my MSI. I overclocked it to 310/650 it didn't give my much difference
What's the company of your card ?
Last edited by NameLess; 07-23-2003 at 04:53 PM.
-
07-23-2003, 04:03 PM
#360
MSI, the core can do around 300 but i keep it at 280 for safety
--Jakk
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|