Page 20 of 82 FirstFirst ... 10 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 30 70 ... LastLast
Results 286 to 300 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. #286
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Dandridge, Tennessee
    Posts
    774

    DJ

    Man DJ, what did you do to get that score, that is about 1,000 point jump from the last time isn't it?? Nice score man--give me the spec's agin on that machine, and the juicy details on the hop up mods you did lol--RH--

  2. #287
    Ultimate Member x51out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
    Posts
    1,434
    Since one can't see the resolution, decreasing that to 800x600 would be my guess. I have a hard time with bitmaps and jpegs passing themselves off as legitimate scores...

  3. #288
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    64
    :P

  4. #289
    Ultimate Member bblqj78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,187
    yep.....definitely

    thats a F___IN awsome score with a 9500non pro. That wee thing must just about be burnt out....what you got hooked up to it....a FREEZER.

    3DMark2003 is very graphics card intensive......nothing much happens when I clock my system....but clocking 9700pro up gives far better results.

  5. #290
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    64
    sorry guys, the score wasnt legit hehe... just wanted to see ur reactions, messed about with the settings coz i was getting mad at my low scores on everything :'(

    shud be gettin the ram after the weekend, let's pray that makes a difference..!!

  6. #291
    Ultimate Member x51out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
    Posts
    1,434
    Here is a slightly overclocked score... BAMM!

  7. #292
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    64
    ok, here's an update of my 2001 score. this time it's legit, check out the res etc. entered far more aggressive memory timings and seems to make a hell of a difference for 3dmark scores. upped my sandra memory bench by about 150mb/s.

    http://www.minimised.com/3dmark2001-myroom.jpg

    (ill post this on the 2001 thread too)


    bring on the second channel of ram!! :P

  8. #293
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    64
    :'( not even a noteworthy increase in performance on 2003, just 4280, so i shan't bother posting that score...

    pining for more memory right now...

  9. #294
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    13

    03 scores

    western digital HD 80 gigs
    Ati 9800 pro 128
    1 gig DDR gueel (sp?) dual channeled
    AMD 2500+ (1.84 GHZ) (slk-800 heat sink) tornado fan
    Asus A7N8X 400fsb (two intake and two exhaust fans)
    lite on 52x24x52
    view sonic P95f+ pro series
    logitech speakers Z-560 series

    3dmark03 score 5600

    default settings on the test, graphic card settings were all balenced.

  10. #295
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    4
    hey x51, i cant see the system u tried to hyperlink before, it pulls up mine for some reason lol.... i asked be4... anyone know a water cooling sys that would get my p4 2.4 to 3.2 ghz? i got it to 2.85 without anything going wrong, and im using a volcano 7+.... also im not quite sure about the voltage settings, right now its at something like 2.525 v. when i set my cpu at 3.0 ghz the temp i get is something like 48 C and i was wondering if i needed to up the voltage... when i start to get into windows my comp just restarts... im thinking either voltage, or overheating... anyone help?

    Jack

    P4 2.4 533 at 2.84ghz (fsb 157)
    Abit IS7
    1 GiG Kingston PC2700 Dual Channel
    Radeon 9800 Pro 128mb.
    60 gig 7200 rpm (pos hd, i want the raid sata!)
    54x32x54 mitsumi, 5608 3dmarks at 2.7ghz
    Last edited by crunchyfish; 07-08-2003 at 11:13 PM.

  11. #296
    Ultimate Member x51out's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
    Posts
    1,434
    Really? Must of goofed the link somehow. HERE IT IS AGAIN. See if that one works. Watercooling, huh. Expensive. Mite as well buy a faster processor, imo. You mite have just reached the limit.

  12. #297
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Dandridge, Tennessee
    Posts
    774

    Crunchy/DJ

    Crunchy

    You did not say if 2.4 is a b,c, or what have you. I posted here somewhere:

    I have a 2.4b @ 3204mhz

    My cpu was at 1.550v(yours seems kind of high--sure it is not mem volt??)
    Mem DDR was 2.60v
    Air cooled --Spark 7
    When I got up close to 3300mhz, sytem would start rebooting, but not because of heat, as temp never went above 50c per ASUS probe, that was just the limit to the cpu speed/or memory I guess. Others here can probably be of more help, I am just learning.

    DJ--That 9500 beats my 9500Pro by about a 100. Do you even have it o/c, as if flashed to o/c, would show up as a 9700pro I think?? Where did you start on the memory timings DJ, I have not messed with those yet?? Would like to learn something here?? Give me some hints?? --RH--

  13. #298
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Dandridge, Tennessee
    Posts
    774

    Needforspeed

    Nice score--those 9800's sure are nice. Wish I had the bucks!

  14. #299
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    64
    Originally posted by x51out
    Really? Must of goofed the link somehow. HERE IT IS AGAIN. See if that one works. Watercooling, huh. Expensive. Mite as well buy a faster processor, imo. You mite have just reached the limit.
    how did you run the 60 sound test?? i heard from someone who had the audigy 2 that they cudnt even run it!! :O:O

    roadhog, i altered the timings in the bios, u have to change this setting which is 'memory timing by spd' to disabled which gives u a bunch of manual settings including cas latency, cas to ras latency, ras precharge etc.... thats how i boosted my score.

    3dmark is SO graphics card intensive it's untrue. My memory speed made no difference really. Only about 100 points compared to 1000 or so in 2001. 9500 is only 64mb remember so the patch only upgraded it to a 64mb 9500 pro (8 pix pipelines), clock is at 350 mem at 310 both stable, no artefacts.

    memory timings initially bummed out 2001 so knocked fsb down to 275 now instead of 280.

    gonna do some more tweaking later, memory can squeeze a lil more hehe

  15. #300
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    30
    Originally posted by dj4play

    how did you run the 60 sound test?? i heard from someone who had the audigy 2 that they cudnt even run it!! :O:O
    I have an Audigy 1, and I can do the 60 second sound test. You just need the latest drivers from Creative.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •