-
Ultimate Member
HERE is the reason why most of us have POOR scores
http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/Other/3dmark03/
3DMarks03 REALLY uses 128 Meg of VGA ram Minimum
so those of us with 64 Meg
we have to go throught the slow AGP pipe to Share normal RAM to deal with the stuff
-
Member
Whew!! that's one big file for benchmarking...post my score when I get there...
-
People dont download the benchmakr. There is no point. This bench is useless at the moment cause the hardware for this test hardly exist. There are only 3 DX9 cards out there and thats all the benchmakrs uses. So every geforce owner at the moment cann forget it.
This bench will be usefull in about 1 year, when most of us have DX9 Gpu's and some games will acctually use DX9.
i just uninstalled it again.
-
Member
My first 3DMark 2003 score is 1228
AMD Athlon TB 1.4Ghz
512Mb 133Mhz RAM
G4 Ti4200 64Mb
Audigy
Not bad considering...
Actually, I have no idea what this means other than I don't have any hardware to support this new benchmark.
-
Ultimate Member
-
1781 all stock wow now i want to get rid off my g4ti4200 and get the gf fx
Asus A7v8x
Amd XP 2700+
Kingston 512mb Pc3200
Asylum Geforce 4 ti4200 128mb ( bentch at 11829 not o/c)
Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum
Maxtor 80Gb with 8mb buffer ATA - 133
Sony DVD-rom 16x
Samsumg 52x Burner with 8mb cache
400W PS
SLK-900u + Panasonic 92mm fan
and lot of fans
Windows xp Pro SP1
-
g4 ti4800 and i get a frickin 1467 i know i need more ram in my computer and its only a 1.4 ghz but comon i was averageing like 10 fps in everything but the first test o the frustration
-
g4 ti4800 and i get a frickin 1467 i know i need more ram in my computer and its only a 1.4 ghz but comon i was averageing like 10 fps in everything but the first test o the frustration
-
Senior Member
Clearly FutureOnion want's this benchmark to last. Our egos are taking body blows since our tricked out game machines can only manage 4 sig figs in 2k3, where as in 2k1 we were in the 11000+ range. 2k3 benchs where games are (theoretically) headed and thus gives you a guesstimate of how well your current hardware will perform in cutting edge games of 2007.
Nvidia is pissy because the PS1.4 deal is comming back to bite them in the ****. Eh, screw it. It's just a bench mark. John Holmes has us all beat, so who really cares anyway.
-
Ultimate Member
John Holmes??? Didn't he die in like 1988?
-
Ultimate Member
Originally posted by civic91dx
1781 all stock wow now i want to get rid off my g4ti4200 and get the gf fx
90% chance there wont be a GFX!
Read my post in vido card section.
-
Junior Member
Wow, I kicked your guy's asses. 1748, thank you very much!!!
Ahh, that score sucks. I've got crazy hardware too.
-P4 2.53 ghz
-512mb PC-1066
-GF4 ti4600
-AND a Klipsch Promedia 5.1, great system. Go buy it.
2.533 oc'ed to who knows?
-
Ultimate Member
Quoted by Kaiser_235:
-AND a Klipsch Promedia 5.1, great system. Go buy it.
Yeah, as soon as my dog starts farting $100 bills... hmmm, let's see... wow. only FOUR FARTS! I can handle that.
-
3dMark 2003 4909.
3dMark2001SE 14257
AMD 2400XP
1 gig ddr ram (running dual 512)
Asus A7N8X deluxe mobo
Radeon 9700 pro
All running stock, no overclocking or memory tweaks.
now slight vid card oc
will try more aggressive ram/cpu timings to see what happens.
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=265021
Last edited by jotto; 02-20-2003 at 06:15 PM.
-
Member
new score was 1100 something but got a new proc.... where'd i put my Radeon 9700
Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
MSI KT3 Ultra 2
SB Live! Value
Intel NIC
2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)
TwEaKist
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|