Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Mother temperature sensors

  1. #1
    Junior Member smeghead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Posts
    24

    Mother temperature sensors

    After read a lot of CPU fan reviews I can't stop wondering:
    how exact are the temperature sensors on fairly modern motherboards?

    I've got an Asus A7V333 coupled with an Athlon 2000XP and, according to AsusProbe, the temperatures in the comp are:

    CPU (idle): 53 degrees Celsius (about 62-63 at full load).
    Motherboard: 33 degrees Celsius.

    Now I know that these are way too high (I've got a crappy bundled fan, switching to a Thermaltake Volcano 9 soon), but are they accurate?
    I know one of the problems with monitoring CPU temp Ã*s that the sensor doesn't actually touch the core, thus reporting a understated temperature.

    So what I'm trying to get at is: by how much does the onboard sensor "miss" the actual temperature?


    Ehm... Sorry 'bout the thread name... Thinking about one thing and typing another, I guess...
    Last edited by smeghead; 02-07-2003 at 08:55 AM.

  2. #2
    Gone Fishin' ukulele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Southern Most Point in US
    Posts
    6,260
    Reported temp and actual core temps as reported by bios depends on the accuracy of the probes and thier placement in the motherboard. Your reported temps for that CPU are actually about average for a stock factory setup. The accuracy of the temp probes is not as important as the net change they indicate. If the system is stable at the max indicated temp then you don't need to sweat. If it keeps rising then you still get an indication that is usefull. It tells you when need to clean out the dust and check the fans.

  3. #3
    Junior Member smeghead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Posts
    24
    Well, there's no problem as long as I keep the CPU at stock speed. But where's the fun in that?

    I had it running at 1,81GHz (FSB@145), and it actually performed quite well. At least if you don't mind a CPU temperature at 70+ degrees Celsius. Hehe.

    What concerns me though, is the fact that the sensor probably reports a less than accurate temperaure reading. The fact that the reported temperature is so high when the sensor isn't even touching the core, makes me a bit nervous...

  4. #4
    Gone Fishin' ukulele's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Southern Most Point in US
    Posts
    6,260
    If you are going to overclock it then you need to worry about additional cooling solutions. What difference does it make what your reported temps actually are? If you are determined to fry it by overclocking knowing what the actual reported temp was when it goes won't help much. CPU's don't all fry at the exact same temp anyway, expecially when they are overclocked.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •