Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 85

Thread: Benchmarking a 486

  1. #1
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922

    Benchmarking a 486

    Benchmarking a 486DX5/133 (kingston turbochip)

    Here are some benchmarks, just for the curious. This was with SiSoft Sandra 2002.
    The system specs are as follows:

    AMD 5X86 133MHz (486DX5/133) 16KB L1 cache (Sandra reports 213MHz b/c of no CPUID, perhaps? )
    Dell "D-Type" motherboard
    64MB EDO DRAM 60ns (4x16)
    Diamond Speedstar 2000/64 2MB ISA graphics accelerator (Cirrus logic 5429/34)
    2GB/6GB caviar 5400RPM HDDs on SIIG card
    32X Poineer CD-ROM
    Teac 3.5/5.25 combo drive
    3COM 10baseT/10base5 ISA ethernet adapter
    Sound blaster 16 ISA
    Liteon 223Watt AT PSU

    Win98 SE

    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member omega31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    So. Cal. USA
    Posts
    2,380
    Wow! Blazing fast!

    I think I'll go bench my 486dx2 66mhz Packard Bell.

  3. #3
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    And I will strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger those who attempt to poison and destroy my brothers

  4. #4
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Originally posted by omega31
    Wow! Blazing fast!

    I think I'll go bench my 486dx2 66mhz Packard Bell.
    I bet mine could beat yours!

    Post some marks!

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    188
    I'll bet my Athlon XP 2400+ will kick your 486's a**.

  6. #6
    Ultimate Member AllGamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    16,305
    Cool

    let me run Sandra on my 486 lets see how it compares

  7. #7
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Originally posted by Gen_Hideki_Tojo
    I'll bet my Athlon XP 2400+ will kick your 486's a**.
    Well, well.

    Who would have known?

    According to intel, everything AMD is inferior to their CPUs, so,
    if I follow intel's guidance,


    my 486 will kick your 2400+'s a**!

  8. #8
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    My parent's 33 mhz macintosh can take you all,

    because Apple says all macs are better than all pcs!
    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

  9. #9
    Gone Forever....... gibsinep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,527
    A very informative benchmark, I have been dying to know how they compare
    Nothing in life is as certain as death, but death is not a wall but a doorway to a new adventure

  10. #10
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Let's see those marks!

    Next in line:
    Macintosh II vs. 80286/16!


  11. #11
    Gone Forever....... gibsinep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    6,527
    Oh no two speed dogs
    Nothing in life is as certain as death, but death is not a wall but a doorway to a new adventure

  12. #12
    Ultimate Member omega31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    So. Cal. USA
    Posts
    2,380
    Maybe I'll bench my 286 10mhz! Oh, wait. I don't have an EGA monitor anymore.

  13. #13
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Originally posted by omega31
    Maybe I'll bench my 286 10mhz! Oh, wait. I don't have an EGA monitor anymore.
    $10!

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    188
    It's Apple II not Macintosh II, Vapor.

    ==========================
    General Hideki Tojo,
    Prime Minister, Japan
    His Majesty's Imperial Japanese Army

  15. #15
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Apple II=Mac II

    WHO CARES???!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •