Using Cat7 got 2850 up from 2401 cat6 at stock, no oc. ATi 9600 non pro.
Printable View
Using Cat7 got 2850 up from 2401 cat6 at stock, no oc. ATi 9600 non pro.
3D Marks 2003: 4251 marks
ATI Radeon 9700 Pro
P4 2.4
1GB PC2700 DDR
at default settings
wow my oc'ed radeon 9600 pro is almost up to par with that 9700 pro!!!1
3dmark03 w/ (513/340.20): 4059
Andiesean...
Thats a pretty low score for ur system....go into driver settings...advanced settings and make sure everything is set to performance. On my exact same system I get 5000 points...everything at standard speeds. I have overclocked my 9700pro (pushing it a bit more every so often) and am getting near 5700 3dmarks (simialar to 9800pro scores at default speeds).
Pentium IV 3.0GHz
2 x 512MB Twinmos 400DDR
Radeon 9800Pro 128MB
Catalyst 3.7 (driver set to stable, not to performance)
ASUS P4C800 deluxe
WD 120GB 8MB
Audigy 2
DirectX9.0b
Win XP -SP1
With -now and then- framerates <10 FPS
3DMark2003: 5390
Will test it also with driver set to performance and vsync off as suggested by CWIN (tnx, by the way).
3DMark2003: 5427 (all tabs on performance, vsync was off during both benchmarks by the way)
Very good score (for the settings). Try setting everything to performance in the direct3d section, and disabling vsync :tQuote:
Originally posted by Uisge
(driver set to stable, not to performance)
3DMark2003: 5390
Welcome to the club :rolleyes:Quote:
Originally posted by Mm9004
I got 1,000,000,000
hmmm scary i didnt change my performance tab there set to the middle and i got 5390 with a 9800 NP just oced... :\
i'll go re-benchmark :)
i got 1 point on 3dmark03
current set up
radeon 9800 pro
200 mhz CPU
64mb SDRAM
i cant seem to figure out the problem!!!
im kidding :)
try a defrag ;)Quote:
Originally posted by ComPooTer
i got 1 point on 3dmark03
current set up
radeon 9800 pro
200 mhz CPU
64mb SDRAM
i cant seem to figure out the problem!!!
2.1 amd
512 166
9800 NP 417/317
raid 0
gigabyte 7vaxp
5693
cat 3.7 lol and the 3.8's JUST came out :|
Don't expect much from the Cat 3.8, atleast from a synthetic benchmark point of view.
However, I find NWN looks nicer under Cat 3.8 than 3.6 (I d'led the 3.7's but never bothered to install them).
is it just me or what, i installed the 3.8 drivers and i couldve sworn the image quality improved even more, i was like woww
quite possibly, haven't played any games since installing. Anyone who hasen't installed yet wanna take some before/after screenies?