I just want to be the 1000th post:D
Printable View
I just want to be the 1000th post:D
Yoshi always has to be special!!
Oh, yea, braamer is that score correct? My last was 6548,
3200 @ 2504 12.5*200
9800 Pro @ 441/750
I am special:pQuote:
Originally posted by mobo57
Yoshi always has to be special!!
That you are!
Here's my 3DMark 03 scores...
This is with the core up to 455 and the memory up to 760.
Still 2500+ at 11x200
512MB Kingston
Asus A7N8x Deluxe
High-Quality Allied 400W PSU :x
My system:
Althon XP 2500+
785 mb DDR400 giel
120 GB Westerng digital 100mb/s
mother board.. Abit AN7
256mbnvidia geforce fx EVGA 5700 LE
500watts PSU
My score PCmark 04
2960 point
there is some bug in PCmark04
my 2500xp should be 1.84
but reading only 1.75gbz not sure what...
What do you have the FSB set to in the Bios?Quote:
Originally posted by dotinh
My system:
Althon XP 2500+
785 mb DDR400 giel
120 GB Westerng digital 100mb/s
mother board.. Abit AN7
256mbnvidia geforce fx EVGA 5700 LE
500watts PSU
My score PCmark 04
2960 point
there is some bug in PCmark04
my 2500xp should be 1.84
but reading only 1.75gbz not sure what...
it 333 but actual is 334.51
show below
I'm to 6231 ATM
--Jakk:t
It's weird, but my 6800GT core speed max went down, while the memory went up. At 423/1200, I get 13147.
In a lot of scenario's having faster memory is more beneficial than having a faster core. (e..g. its better performance wise to have a 20Mhz o/c on the memory than it is to have a 30Mhz o/c on the core)
--Jakk:t
I guess it just depends on the card architecture.
I was worried that overclocking had wrecked my card. I think that if i had damaged the card, then both gpu and memory performance would go down. It's strange that the memory would clock higher after burn-in.
Oh, I also changed the gpu core to Arctic Silver, but that was like the day after I got it.
Just run the test and any advice would be appreciated
Athlon 2500XP
512 3200 DDR
ATI 9600
3dmark 03: 2415
not really sure if this is a good representation of what the mobo and graphics have to offer
Hey adi, Welcome to Sysopt!
Is your video card a pro or le or se version? If it is a pro, that score is low.
Are you overclocked on your cpu or video card?
What is your os, mobo, cooling?
A few details from you and we should be able to squeeze some more out of your system for you, if it dosn't get smoked first! (Just kidding)
:D
Hey adi, Welcome to Sysopt!
Is your video card a pro or le or se version? If it is a pro, that score is low.
Are you overclocked on your cpu or video card?
What is your os, mobo, cooling?
A few details from you and we should be able to squeeze some more out of your system for you, if it dosn't get smoked first! (Just kidding)
it's just the bog standard 9600 128MB
win xp
Optronix mobo AL7
and the only cooling is an artic cooling processor fan
cheers dude
Check your settings on your vid card. Turn off your AA and AF settings or set for performance. Make sure you have the latest ATI drivers, or at least 4.6. You can also use Radlinker and try oc'ing your card a bit. Though with stock cooling on it, I would be careful not to go too high, though you should be able to get at least 5 to 7% more comfortably.
Next you can try overclocking your cpu. It looks like your mobo supports the 400 fsb. I think this is your mobo here (last one). http://www.optronix.co.uk/acatalog/AMD.html
If so you should be able to get 3200 speed out of it with the cooling you got with little or no problem at all.
I think just doing both of these will get you a pretty good boost alone. Let us know how it goes and if you need tips on how to oc send me a pm.
Remember: push it till you smell the smoke.... if you got the money!
Gotta go, surf is calling, later... dude
:t
and also make sure, that v-sync is turned off.
cheers for that guys much appreciated. i've set the card for performance though i wasn't sure how to turn the v-sync off. Is it the same as vpu recover in the options?
The mobo linked to is the board i have. How do i go about overclocking the cpu using the 400fsb?
cheers
I just purchased 3DMark 2003 Pro. My system received a score of 11832.
what card have you got there cheetor??
I am running an ATI Radeon X800 XT PCI Express (16x).
what is your full system specs. and where did you get that card from i though it was not released yet.
I bet that thing rocks some socks off....
From what I read in the benchmarks for it it is the fastest card on the market right now.... seems to include just about everything to play and convert to media use.;)
640 bucks, hell no
Thats what i say actually....
Just get a 6800GT....which has plug ins for your basic media....
I think alot of what your paying for is the abilities to convert to different type of media and plug ins...and ATI is making great strides in this area right now....
As far as the buisness sector and corporate world..Nvidia seems to be the leader there...offering several good business solutions that incorporate several computer network infrastructure base..
For $388.00 the 6800GT is on sale a t NewEgg.com now
Darn...I sure wish I could afford it right now....;)
I dont think,that the pci-e version will be faster than the ago version, because
1. modern graphics cards dont even utilize the agp. you cannot even really tell a difference in benchmarks betwenn agp 4x and agp 8x.
2. the card is still a natiuve agp card. it uses an agp-to-pci-e bridge to implement pci-e.
Like for like, AGP is still the marginally faster interface
--Jakk:t
but only, because there are no natiuve pci-e cards out yet. when they come out, they will run marginally faster on pci-e than w/ agp using a pci-e to apg bridge.Quote:
Originally posted by Bigjakkstaffa
Like for like, AGP is still the marginally faster interface
--Jakk:t
technically the transferrate of pci-e 16x is faster than of agp 8x as far as i know.
IIRC, Nvidia is currently using an PCI-E-->AGP bridge chip, while all of Ati's current PCI-E lineup are native PCI-E. Despite this, from what little i've seen thus far, AGP is still marginally faster than even current native PCI-E
--Jakk:t
from what i know, the current nvidia gpus are still native agpo, the next generagtion wioll be native pci-e. i also have read, that the next generation from nvidia will not feature a pci-e to agp bridge, so it will be for pci-e only. i hope, that amd will also support pci-e soon...
according to this article, the max. transfer rate of agp is 2GB/s, for PCI-E 16x its 4GB/s.
dont you guys think that score of his is a bit low. sorry im not too up to date with what is and isnt out i just back from hols. i saw where my CPU came from the AMD and intel one im so happy and my HDD for that matter.
For stock speeds that sounds about rightQuote:
Originally posted by porsch1909
dont you guys think that score of his is a bit low. sorry im not too up to date with what is and isnt out i just back from hols. i saw where my CPU came from the AMD and intel one im so happy and my HDD for that matter.
6306
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3173648
16-pipe cards make us 8-pipers feel small, but then again this rig has killer value. :D :t
Hey cV, what voltages are you using? Also, why are you using those timings? Doesn't the usual nForce 2-2-2-11 work for you?
Sorry guys I've been sick...
I just built a new pc:
Intel P4 3.4 800MHz FSB 1M L2 chache
2Gigabytes of PC3200 RAM
160G SATA Hard Drive
500 Watt Sata compatible Power Supply
ATI Radeon X800 PCI Express 256MB at 1000MHz
core card speed is 500MHz
as far as the PCI Express goes, this VPU chipset is the only one that has 16 Pixel Pipelines. In other words the PCI express interface is the only way to fully utilize this feature, otherwise the card is exactly the same as the AGP version
as for the 3DMark scores, yes it is true that some cards may score higher for now, but when it comes to playing actual games at high resolutions and lols of graphic features like pixel shading, lighting, shadows, etc. ATI cards seem to outperform the competition
I pretty much built my system in anticipation of Half-Life 2, which should be the new best FPS ever. It is true that Doom 3 had groundbreakingly amazing graphics, but thats all it had. It really wasn't a very good game.
Besides I'll be starting my games programming class soon, and I want to have a decent pc. Anyway I'm in class now, lol, so I'd better go, ttyl.
my is on my dell 8200 series ""3368 ""
P4 2.53 533 fsb
768meg of rambus
geforce fx 5600 Ultra 128 meg 8x vore clock 400mhz
i am guess this would suck at 3mark 05
i think i can do with my 5600 ultra than 640 bucks for one compent, yes it would be cool but i can built a comute almost ofr that much