What is your system?Quote:
Originally posted by Benssax
whats ya'lls 3dmark 2003 CPU score.
705 here
Printable View
What is your system?Quote:
Originally posted by Benssax
whats ya'lls 3dmark 2003 CPU score.
705 here
Barton XP2600 @ 2.34ghz.Quote:
Originally posted by MrBurns
What is your system?
Shuttle AN35n Ultra :)
Video card?Quote:
Originally posted by Benssax
Barton XP2600 @ 2.34ghz.
Shuttle AN35n Ultra :)
Quote:
Originally posted by MrBurns
Video card?
Video has nothin to do with CPU score but its a Ti4200 and Kingmax PC3500
Sorry, I didnt get that you posted the CPU score.Quote:
Originally posted by Benssax
Video has nothin to do with CPU score but its a Ti4200 and Kingmax PC3500
My CPU score is 635 (XP 2700+@2403MHz). The CPU score at defaqult clock (2166MHz) is 577. For the overall score and my System see my post at page 35 and http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=626856
I dont understand, why you have a higher CPU score than I, althought I have a higher clock. Do you have a higher FSB (I have 178).
My FSB is 213 :r
I also have a higher FSB now, because I have new memory (2x512MB Infineon PC3200 instead of 2x256MB noname PC2700) but I didnt benchmark, because I am still testing. The highest clock speeds that were prime-stable for at least 6 hours were:Quote:
Originally posted by Benssax
My FSB is 213 :r
175x13.5 = 2363MHz
179x13 = 2327MHz
185x12.5 = 2313MHz
190x12 = 2280MHz
201x11.5 = 2311MHz
203x11.5 = 2334 MHz (only tested two hours)
I didnt test the other multipliers yet. I am still testing the 11.5 multi, it wasnt stable at 205MHz (crashed after about 13 1/2 hours) and I didnt test 11.5x204 yet. Maybe I will get more than 213MHz w/ the multi 11 or a lower multi.
YAY my first Benchmark
5236
P4C800 Deluxe
P4 2.6C @3124Mhz
Corsair XMS 3700 512MB
ATI 9800 Pro
Any one know away to get a higher score
:D I'm not satisfies I NEED MORE POWER:r :r
Is your RAM running in sync mode?Quote:
Originally posted by Yoshi
Any one know away to get a higher score
:D I'm not satisfies I NEED MORE POWER:r :r
sync mode?
intel's dont get major performance hits from being ASYNC, usually you want to run your RAM and FSB sync with AMD processors
You are right, but the system gets a major performance hit, when the memory is running slower, so when the memory is on a lower speed than at default clock, he can get a major performance hit.Quote:
Originally posted by ComPooTer
intel's dont get major performance hits from being ASYNC, usually you want to run your RAM and FSB sync with AMD processors
@Yoshi: sync means, that the memory runs at the same speed as the FSB.
so 800Mhz FSB and 466mhz ddr is ok right?
5843 marks
Intel 2.8C OC'd to 3.4 Ghz.
Asus P4P800
Corsair TwinX Dual Channel DDR Memory PC3200LLPT, 2, 3, 2, 5 timings, 194 Mhz (388 Mhz DDR).
Radeon 9800 AIW Pro
Yes: When your FSB runs at 800MHz QDR, it really runs at 200Mhz (it only has the performance, which an SDR bus would have at 800MHz), but when you run your CPU@3124Mhz, your FSB will not be 200MHz (800MHz QDR), it will be 240MHz (960MHz QDR). If your memory runs at 466MHz DDR, it really runs at 233MHz, so you have a memory:FSB ratio of 7/6 or 116,6%. If you use the same ratio on 240MHz FSB, you have your memory at 280MHz (560MHz DDR). So I am sure, that you dont use this ratio, when you oc, because no PC3700 memory runs at 280MHz. You can still run your memory at sync at 240MHz, because nearly every PC3700 memory goes up to 240MHz. If you run your memory faster than the FSB, you dont have any advantage in performance, because i.e. 400MHz DDR dual channel has the same data transfer rate as the 800MHz QDR bus.Quote:
Originally posted by Yoshi
so 800Mhz FSB and 466mhz ddr is ok right?