Celeron 633

What would this be equvilent to if u compared it to a PIII....
633 Celeron = PIII ???
800 Celeron = PIII ???

Quote:

---

Originally posted by musictoad
What would this be equvilent to if u compared it to a PIII....
633 Celeron = PIII ???
800 Celeron = PIII ???

---

633 celeron = PIII 200 *cackles insanely*

Sorry bout that...

That depends on the application:
Normal business computing ie typing a letter... email... webbrowsing MHZ=MHZ

Games... 40%slower (limited by its bus)
CAD, development, large databases etc. ... almost unusable... (relative)

in the normal configuration all but the newest celerons suffer from poor motherboard graphics integration and a 66mhz memory bus. This makes them almost unusabale for recent games. Bypassing that and tossing in a decent vid card... it will be on par with most machines in its power range in the real world sense. ie i cant always tell 100fps from 90...can you?

FoxW

I'd say something around 550MHz P3 ...

cel 633= p3 of 400-500

cel 800= p3 of 550-650


this is in menchmarks!
like sandra 2002 .


:)

Well the 633/66mhz bus is a slow terd. But the CelII 800mhz/100mhz fsb IS a Pentium 3 people. It is the P3 core so its a p3 minus half the L2 cache. I have one. The new cel's kick the snott out of the originals cause they are a 100fsb P3! Mine outbenches a P3 750mhz using Sisoft Sandre so I would say a 200mhz P3 equivilant is a insult to a good chip. Its got alot more than that. All in All the cel II was to reclaim Intels low end chip over the Duron. I would still take a duron over any celII but the celII does hold its own ground and lives up to P3's quit well.:) :t

Quote:

---

Originally posted by grimfandango
cel 633= p3 of 400-500

cel 800= p3 of 550-650


this is in menchmarks!
like sandra 2002 .


:)

---

Look at my post. I have run sandre and a celII 800 beats a P3 750.;)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by $1500-P4 gamer


Look at my post. I have run sandre and a celII 800 beats a P3 750.;)

---

yea you are right!

:t