HI,
Has anyone hear anything about this video card Eagle GeForce 4 MX-460?
What is the core and the memory speed?
Thanks,
Alex.
Printable View
HI,
Has anyone hear anything about this video card Eagle GeForce 4 MX-460?
What is the core and the memory speed?
Thanks,
Alex.
Geforce 4 MXs are the worst video cards ever. Worst price/performance ratio I've ever seen. If you want cheap performance get a Geforce 3 Ti 200 for ~$90, and it can run just about anything you can throw at it at max detail and max res, while being like twice :rolleyes: as fast as a Geforce 4 MX.
The GF4 MX460 is the best gf4mx, but it's still a gf mx. Yep, GF3 ti200 is much better.
Compare my score in 3dmark2001 with allgamer's work pc with gf4mx:
http://www.sysopt.com/forum/showthre...2&pagenumber=2
Allgamer's work pc has a P4 2.5 ghz!
I agree, the GF4mx is just a beefed up GF2 :eek: getting people to cough up their cash for em, well my mam told me - If I can't say anything nice :D
Much better to get a GF3Ti200 as already said.....incidently Gainward make good cards.
Stefan
Plus it has no pixel or vertex shaders. ;)
Over here in Australia the GF3 cost more than AU$393
The GF4 MX460 cost AU$180
Could you please tell me the specs of the Eagle GF4 MX-460.
They are not bad cards, ok not the best, but I like my gf 4 mx 440. For the specs of the card look on the nvidia site, most cards are similar to the specs listed on the site. Hope this helps. By the way never heard of Eagle Cards.
the all most all gf4mx 460 includin this one come withQuote:
Originally posted by Alex Iannuzzi
HI,
Has anyone hear anything about this video card Eagle GeForce 4 MX-460?
What is the core and the memory speed?
Thanks,
Alex.
300mhz core and 550mhz memory!
:)
but its not a good card if you are a gamer..
If you are not a gamer this card is real good!
but you can play all most all the games with every settin at maxium!
:) :t
I am a gamer. This is the best video card that I can afford right now or I could get a GF4 Ti4200.
much will the ti4200 cost!!am sure it will cost much more than the gf3 !Quote:
Originally posted by Alex Iannuzzi
I am a gamer. This is the best video card that I can afford right now or I could get a GF4 Ti4200.
well cause you are a gamer stay away from the mx series
or you can get an ATI 8500! this is very good too!
in the end if you cant spen 300$+ you might just have to get the gf4mx460!
:(
:)
The GeForce 4 TI4200 SUMA 64meg 3.6ns DDR Ram Active cooling Ram Sinks is $299. So it is cheaper than the GF3.
Does any one know the specs for this card? I have been to the suma website and the only have the Geforce 4 MX series .
the suma is good card!Quote:
Originally posted by Alex Iannuzzi
The GeForce 4 TI4200 SUMA 64meg 3.6ns DDR Ram Active cooling Ram Sinks is $299. So it is cheaper than the GF3.
Does any one know the specs for this card? I have been to the suma website and the only have the Geforce 4 MX series .
its come as 250mhz core/497 or 500mhz ram!.....
some guy I know gotthiscard ..and was real happy with it!
if you are willing to spend more this card is real good..
I suggest you get this card.! if you got the$$
:t
good luck!
Yes that would be your best choice out the the 3 mentioned.
Ok,
I will then get the SUMA GF4 Ti4200.
Thanks,
Alex.
:tQuote:
Originally posted by Alex Iannuzzi
Ok,
I will then get the SUMA GF4 Ti4200.
Thanks,
Alex.
good choice.
I am using Eagle brand GF4 MX440 64MB DDR Ram...
How about this product? What can i say is unreliable, i got lots of grandmother old story to tell about this brand if u want me to explain more about this product...
1. Slow boot time, make my PC boot time between 55seconds to 1minutes. Currently running Windows XP. My previous GF2MX200 doesnt have any problem, it takes 40-45secons only...
2. Windows XP loading screen flick few times using this card.
3. Have to ON the power supply for few seconds ,after that i can only switch on my PC else it dun have any display...
4. ...____, TO BE CONTINUE.
oops, kinda frustrating ler to have this brand...
I too bought a Geforce4-440 and its on its way back to the people I bought it from as I write this. I got this card onsale off a pricewatch deal for 59US plus 10bucks for shipping and all I can say is even at a total of a 69 dollar price tag it isnt worth close to this much :) This mx card runs every game I tried it on like complete ****. I put my old geforce 256 32ddr back in and it runs most games faster and with much much better picture quality then the Geforce 4 did. I am getting a credit and for a few dollars more getting a geforce3 ti. Anyone looking to save money as I was should really think about getting a older high end chip set rather then trying to get the newest low end geforce 4.
How could the Geforce 256 DDR-RAM bet a Geforce 4 Mx-440 64 mb DDR-RAM?
Heh I'm sure in FPS it didnt I was just very very disappointed in the geforce 4 mx. Its just a very poor chip set. I have a GF2-MX in one of my other machines and I allways liked it but this new flavor of MX doesnt come close to living up to the GF2.
:D
I am "happy" owner of this card.
My sample is actually GF4 MX440 with MX460 chip!
Memory is 5ns Hynix (something like EX Hyndai) and default (bios) settings are 270MHz core / 400MHz memory!
Rated frequencies for MX460 are 300/550 MHz!
My sample can be overclocked heavily but heat dissipation is probably too big...
Eagle is "brand" famous for cheap cards. This is achieved usually with savings on memory chips which are currently most expensive. As is in this case.
At any way, this is best buy (price/performance) because it is better than any GF2 and NV17 has dual 350MHz ramdac (Nview) and hardware DVD decoding.
Flickering at boot procedure is actually switching between two ramdac's when system tests what is connected on graphic card. Of course this takes few seconds...
ddj- I dont know if I would say it is the best price/performance card out there. :confused: :t
You are quite right!Quote:
Originally posted by gibsinep
ddj- I dont know if I would say it is the best price/performance card out there. :confused: :t
Just in certain moment in space and time that was for me...
Today it is different.
Just it is far better than any gf2!
O ok , I didnt know what time period you were speaking of. :)
For the gamer on a budget:
Geforce4ti4200 64mb
Geforce3ti200 64mb/128mb (both are purdy cheap)
Radeon 8500 64MB
Radeon 8500 128MB
:)
I heard that the Radeon 8500 has some problems or something and doesn't perform as good as a GF4Ti4200. I'll stick with the Ti4200. :DQuote:
Originally posted by OpK Chowdy
For the gamer on a budget:
Geforce4ti4200 64mb
Geforce3ti200 64mb/128mb (both are purdy cheap)
Radeon 8500 64MB
Radeon 8500 128MB
:)
I'm gaming with an old-school GeForce 2 Ti that I just bought, 64MB DDR, TV-out (S-video). The card is unbelievable! I get just over 5000 3DMarks with just my XP 1800+ overclocked to 2100!
My brother has a GF4 MX440 with an AMD Duron 1.2 Ghz and he gets 4500 3dmarks. He is almost catching up to you. :eek:Quote:
Originally posted by Logan[TeamX]
I'm gaming with an old-school GeForce 2 Ti that I just bought, 64MB DDR, TV-out (S-video). The card is unbelievable! I get just over 5000 3DMarks with just my XP 1800+ overclocked to 2100!
Might be for pure performance off the Ge4, cause you know it's not coming from the Duron.
Let's see it do some maxed grahpics in Medal of Honor, or Spiderman... 1024x768 at least, full-out please.
I don't think it's going to keep up.
Plus he doesnt have picel or vertex shaders.