How low have you driven your scores?

[Jimstep]

When I turn on all the good eye candy on the graphics card, my 3DMark 2001 score is 3498.

MSI K7T Turo Limited model 6330 (4.36 4in1 drivers)
AMD Athlon 1.4Ghz 266Mhz (no overclocking)
Atlas 512Mb 133Mhz Sdram CL2 6layer
Visiontek GeForce 3 ti200 (21.88 detonator drivers)

Antialiasing = 4x
Direct3d = best image quality
OpenGl = anisotropic on, vsync

[gibsinep]

Well i never did cause i dont knwo hwo to turn tht stuff off. How would I do that


thx

[DocEvi1]

How low

I turn that stuff on my scores drops to like 1000 - KyroII isn't suited to these benchmarks.

What sort of FPS do you get in UT? I can get 80/90 running at 1280*1600 will max detail. Runs smoothly.

Stefan

[suprsheep2]

the lower I put my settings, the lower my 3dmark score goes

[L1 b-boy]

Me and my mate went head to head on a defualt benchmark & on lowest resolution, nvida settings at defualt values, results were as follows,
(as of 23.30 20/1/02)
Mates system: p3 766/512pc133/Geforce2,64ddr/gigabyte mobo, 3630 on max(1024x768, 32bpp)
3624 on min settings (640x480, 16bpp)

My System: Amd T-Bird 1Ghz/768pc133/Geforce2mx100/200, 32meg(with added fan and ram heatsinks by me)/Jetway 663as ultra mobo,
1633 on max
3660 on min

I Think im correct in saying the reason his card scores lots better at higher resolution is mainly becuase the cards ram is the only difference between the two, MX cards are mearly bottlenecked, is this correct?

Good Links for MX overclocking would be very appreciated!

[spidey_joe80@hotmail.com]

i benched quake 3

1600x1200
8x anistrophic (did i spell that right) filtering
4x antialiasing
all effects max
Demo 01
drum roll please...........................
............................................
............................................
.............................................
31fps absolutely unplayable but was fun while it lasted

[Ammok]

For mx overclocking try rivatuner at www.nvworld.com

[Bizkitkid2001]

I can play quake with 31 FPS

[Ammok]

Ok Jimstep,

3d2000 at 1600 x 1200 x 32 scores a modest 1679.

Pretty poor to watch as well, LOL, drops to eight frames per sec on one of em!!!!.

[Jimstep]

Originally posted by Ammok
Ok Jimstep,

3d2000 at 1600 x 1200 x 32 scores a modest 1679.

Pretty poor to watch as well, LOL, drops to eight frames per sec on one of em!!!!.

I just tried 1600x1200x32 and 3DMark2k1 just went away. It was weird. I don't know what to think of that.

[Ammok]

My 3d2000 does that when I oc the cpu too much. Not got good enough cooling. Thats why i am only running at 1500.