Originally posted by nish1021 XP1900 OC'd to XP2000
GF3 Ti500 v23.11 OC'd to 255/531
512MB PC2100 DDR
Soyo Dragon+ mobo
36.1GB U160 SCSI drive
SoundBlaster Live! Platinum
Windows XP Pro
3dMark2001 Score of 8629 w/ 1024x768 resolution setting
If anyone beat that, please tell me how...
If I recall correctly this topic tops out at 1.4 Gightz. The 1900xp is a tad faster than 1.4. But that score can be easily beaten with a 1900xp not OC'ed running a GF3 Standard OC'ed to 270/550.
Note: The Card is NOT running any of the orig cooling equipment.
This can easily be done especially if with 98 using a Ram Disk. Then it won't matter how fast your HD is.. you won't be using it.
My newest setup out of the box
Everything default without any tweaking as of yet.....
Default settings for 3dmark 2001SE @1024X768 With No AA
Score of 8432
My Rig
Lian Li PC-65 With Clear side window modded with window decals and sound activated neon light.....Very Cool!
Enermax dual fan 431 Watt PSU
(Pentium 4) 2.0 ghz northwind with 512 cache
Asus P4T-E (Mainboard)
2X256 rambus ECC800 memory by samsung
Gainward Geforce 3 powerpack before TI's were released
Sound blaster live value
Sohoware Nic Card
Plextor 24x10x40A
Creative 52x cdrom....Working on getting a DVD player and a new sound card as well.
Well that's my system and benchmarks.......I'll post another benchmark after some bios tweaking and bump up the video cards Mem/core speeds.
I know this is overkill......but its been my dream rig
Originally posted by DocEvi1 Me =
1.4 Tbird
512 PC133
Hercules Prophet 4500 (KyroII)
Raid0 array - two 5400 40Gig drives (I meant to buy 7200 but they sold me the wrong ones and I didn't check )
3DMark2001 - 2770
Stefan
Strange !
I'm on 1.2 Tbird o/c @ 1404Mhz
256 Mo SDram
Ge Force2MX200 o/c from 175/165 to 209/199
MSI K7T Turbo
std bench 3D2001 SE of 3150 points
it was 2600 points before o/c
....but Kyro II is much better than Gef2MX !!!!
Microsoft Windows 98
DirectX Version 8.1
A7V133
CPU AMD Athlon(tm) Processor 908 MHz
FSB 100 MHz
Memory 256 MB
Graphics Chipset ATI RADEON DDR
Driver Name RADEON 7200
Driver Version 4.13.9009
Video Memory 64 MB
Program Version 3DMark2001 SE
Resolution 1024x768 32bit
Texture Format Compressed
FSAA Disabled
Z-Buffer Depth 24bit
Frame Buffer Double
Rendering Pipeline D3D Hardware T&L
3DMark 2k1 SE Score: 2910
I think this is pretty low and I will try the test with other drivers.
MY POS 700Mhz AMD classic (yes the pos), UNDERCLOCKED (yes underclocked to 635 due to instablility @ full clock on a pos Gigabyte board) ownz all j00 n00bs lol
between 2814 and 2835 !!! ooo yea!!
512 Mb SDRAM PC100 (not 133)
MSI Geforce4 MX440 64MB
GA-71XE pos Slot A (never ever ever ever get it!!!)
AMD 1600XP with absolutely Nothing OC'd !!! 1.4GHz
Soyo Dragon Plus MoBo with onboard RAID
768 MB Micron PC2100 DDR Ram
2 x 40 Gig ATA 100 - 7200 RPM Western Digital HDD's in RAID 0
(Built by) ATI Radeon 8500 64MB DDR Video Card
If I recall correctly this topic tops out at 1.4 Gightz. The 1900xp is a tad faster than 1.4. But that score can be easily beaten with a 1900xp not OC'ed running a GF3 Standard OC'ed to 270/550.
Note: The Card is NOT running any of the orig cooling equipment.
This can easily be done especially if with 98 using a Ram Disk. Then it won't matter how fast your HD is.. you won't be using it.
10216 for that score.
Take a look at "davesino" below. He got 8616 with only a 1.4 GHz (AMD 1600xp) with no overclocking, and he's only 13 points behind your 2000xp. At least he's in the right category (750 - 1.4 range)
Originally posted by nish1021 XP1900 OC'd to XP2000
GF3 Ti500 v23.11 OC'd to 255/531
512MB PC2100 DDR
Soyo Dragon+ mobo
36.1GB U160 SCSI drive
SoundBlaster Live! Platinum
Windows XP Pro
3dMark2001 Score of 8629 w/ 1024x768 resolution setting
If anyone beat that, please tell me how...
Take a look at "davesino" result. It's a score of 8616 with only a 1.4 GHz (AMD 1600xp) with no overclocking, and it's only 13 points behind your 2000xp. With overclocking, it could easily go higher. At least it's in the right category (750 - 1.4 range)
Probably would have been better to quote the guy who posted those results... not the one that was pointing something out...
Kinda threw me off by quoting me... Kinda was wondering where I got a 2000xp from...
Originally posted by KaiserSotze Probably would have been better to quote the guy who posted those results... not the one that was pointing something out...
Kinda threw me off by quoting me... Kinda was wondering where I got a 2000xp from...
Right! Sorry. I responded to the correct quote now.
Reply With Quote
shoot first and ask questions later 
)
Bookmarks