+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    180

    MX400 to buy or not to buy?

    I finally accepted the fact that I have mistakenly bought a MX200 geforce 2 so Im turning the tides on the power of a MX400 can give me?

  2. #2
    Your AGP card may still be too slow if you are a hardcore gamer and/or your system is in the high end.

    People would be able to help you more if you post your system specs and the applications you use.


  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    dallas
    Posts
    24
    He's right. Find out how the games you play actually draw and how they do lighting. A "better" card won't make much of a difference if it's the wrong card for the job or if your processor can't fully utilize it.

    Either way, I've always felt turning the down the resolution, clip plane, color depth, or degrading the lighting/filter in game was worth the money I saved by not buying a new video card. Hell, sometimes you can't even notice the difference when you degrade some of the options - all I've ever cared about is frame rate.

    Although your card isn't the best out there, it's certainly not garbage. Who cares who wins the "best gaming computer" pissing contest anyways.

    My advice:
    1) Kill all system tray applications. System tray icons aren't just icons with a tiny shell program running, those **** things are usually the full program just minimized and eat up lots of RAM and sometimes processor resources. why they don't make tray icons seperate programs that execute the real thing if you want to do anything other than basic tasks is beyond me. This stupid pop up killing program I'm currently running is using 7 MB of RAM. WTF!? 7MB to run a loop that reads window titles? Honestly, has anyone here ever made a program that ate that much RAM? Maybe it has a porn video waiting for me out in RAM if I press special keys on it... I'll go try to find it and report back later.

    2) Try overclocking if you don't have heat issues.
    3) Add more RAM if you don't have atleast 128MB.
    4) Degrade the graphics in game and see if the difference is bearable.
    5) THEN consider getting a new card/processor.
    Last edited by SMU_DORK; 11-20-2001 at 09:44 PM.

  4. #4
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    MX400 will give you more then twice pefrormance then MX200 (128bit memory + higher frequencies).
    What system you got ?

    Best Regards ...

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    180
    My system specs

    Tomato ZX98-AT mobo
    PII 400 Mhz.
    96 MB RAM PC100 CAS LATENCY 3 (cant get it to CAS 2 due to mobo bugs)
    GeForce 2 MX200 64MB
    Creative SB16
    and a slow crappy HDD

  6. #6
    Ultimate Member Sweeper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    lost at the moment
    Posts
    1,746
    First, even with the MX400 your not going to get the results your looking for with your current setup. May I suggest YOU:
    Upgrade your HD. Pick up a 7200rpm/ATA100 (though your board may not utilize the ATA100) it's still worth the upgrade and you'll notice the difference. Good to have for future upgrades.
    Then get rid of the MX200 and get the 400.
    If possible, ram is cheap!!!! Get the system up to atleast 128mb.
    Then later on UPGRADE the CPU. Find out what your MB supports and pick up a new CPU.


    Regards,
    Sweeper

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    dallas
    Posts
    24
    I would get a faster CPU and more RAM before I got the MX400. Maybe if you were running (1.2 GHz & 256 RAM)+ I'd suggest the new card. I got the MX200 in a bundle (yeah yeah, crack all the bundle jokes you want, but I got a STEAL) and it's been doing just fine running FPS games and DAOC.

    Programs rarely write to disk while running (outside of user-initiated output) because of all the RAM you can get nowadays. New HDD isn't needed unless you want to boost application load time, which in my opinion doesn't really matter. I used to care about HD specs back in the day, but when I buy them now I just grab the cheapest one that is the size I want. I guess I'd think differently if I were running a busy server though.

    Bundle I got:
    P4 1.5GHz, 60GB HDD, 256 RAM, MX200, 12X DVD, CD-RW (too lazy for ..x..x.. spec), all the usual peripherals & software... for $725 ($75 cheaper than advertised )
    + it was all set up for me which was a huge plus cause I needed the new comp ASAP. Came with a network card too - Guess who gets plugged into a satellite modem shared by 6 people in a week *does a stupid dance, making a fool of himself*
    Last edited by SMU_DORK; 11-23-2001 at 03:17 AM.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke