+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: DDR vs SDR

  1. #1
    Member derek79602's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Abilene TX USA
    Posts
    291

    DDR vs SDR

    Here we go....I am considering upgrading to a DDR mobo. I currently am running a 1 gig Tbird 200fsb with 2x256 pc133 and 1x128 pc133 at cas 2. (Total of 640 megs) If I upgrade to a DDR board probably the max memory I can afford up front is a stick of 256 DDR. Basically my question is will I get better (bandwidth)performance (benches and gaming) from 256 megs of DDR or 640 megs of SDR?
    Derek

  2. #2
    Member Dokeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Location
    Athens, Ga. 30606
    Posts
    214
    if you have 640 mb RAM your probably wouldnt see any difference. You might even take a performance hit. I i can remember correctly DDR only provides about a 10% increase. So, mabey 640mb of DDR would make a difference but it seems like you would take a performance drop by only getting 256mb

  3. #3
    Senior Member jaida's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    Calgary, AB Canada
    Posts
    707
    what operating system are you running?
    if you are running win2000 or xp it will utilize more memory then any win 9x os.

    Basically 256 mb of ddr as opposed to 640 mb of sdram is plenty. If you are running games and doing alot of benching etc. you will get better performance from the ddr. Bascially going with 256 mb of ddr will be a performance increase. This is due to the fact that ddr is about 20% better performer than sdram (most times even more) and that your 640 mb of sdram is never fully utilized.

  4. #4
    Member derek79602's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Abilene TX USA
    Posts
    291
    Okay two different points of view... anyone validate either one of these?

    Running 98se.
    Derek

  5. #5
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    I'd stay with 640MB of SDR SDRAM. Sure, "DDR" sounds nice, but ... you'll only get up to 10% increase, and that only in apps which work with memory intensively.
    Yet, Win98SE can't work with more that 512MB of RAM effectively.
    I'm perfectly happy with my Abit KT7A and 256MB PC133 Micron Cas2, very well tuned system. Money isn't a big problem for me so I could easily upgrade with KR7A (KT266A) and 256MB Crucial Cas2 DDR, but what for ?
    Donno, it's up to you

    Best Regards ...

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    32
    I thought that PC 133 SDRAM pumps data at 1.2 Gigs of data per sec and the DDR pumps @ 2.1 Gigs of data per sec and the 800 mhz RDRAM pumps 3.2 Gigs per sec Maybe I was drunk at the point when I was lookin for mem info.

    Can someone clarify the data pumped per sec by the most used mem.:o


  7. #7
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    PC133 - ~1.1GB/s
    PC1600 (PC200) - 1.6GB/s
    PC2100 (PC266) - 2.1GB/s
    PC600 RDRAM - 2.4GB/s
    PC800 RDRAM - 3.2GB/s

    Best Regards ...

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
    Posts
    32
    Thank you ND I guess I wasn't too drunk.It sucks heh (RDRAM) or maybe it's the pentium cpu not really gettin with the ram.expensive ohhh I happen to have it by the way

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke