+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    daveleau
    Guest

    MS calls open source potentially viral

    It is causing CRITICISM folks, not the rare disease known as critism. Sorry for not checking my spelling better Scott.

    Dave

  2. #2
    CMonster
    Guest
    I can see why Linux has Microsoft upset - I just installed SuSE Linux 7.2 Personal edition which I bought from Fry's last Sunday for $19.95 -and it is awesome!


    That's right, a boxed operating system with tons of applications -they didn't skimp on this personal edition, and basic manuals are included for just $19.95


    -today, July 3rd, is the last day- then it goes back up to $29-


    This is really polished Linux folks, and nothing seems to be broken like in Mandrake 8 (sorry Mandrake).

    [This message has been edited by CMonster (edited 07-03-2001).]

  3. #3
    doggabone
    Guest
    I noticed that the article says that the FreeBSD license is exempt from the restriction list - could that be becaue MS still uses it for Hotmail and doesn't want to restrict itself?

    And - I don't know much about the GPL licensing models - but does running on the Linux OS automatically mean that all your code is open source? I would hope (and probably be disappointed, I know > ) that, while it is legal to restrict how I may license software written using "your" tools, that "you" can't restrict what software I choose to use with it!!

    I thought that the quote "While software companies can put whatever restrictions they choose into a software license, 'this isn't just another software company. This is Microsoft' ... " was interesting and spot-on. (If that's accurate, I s'pose it answers my question of the above paragraph .) One wonders if anyone @ MS actually read the apellate court findings - or just the newspaper headlines that declared MS the total victor ...

    Thanks for the tip-off SysOpt folx

  4. #4
    TCWolffe
    Guest
    They allow FreeBSD, yes, because they use it. They use it, because the open source model is a bit different.....under GPL products like linux, when you add code, you share it with everyone else, and thus, everyone benefits......with products like BSD, you can make changes, and you can choose whether you want to share or not.....so of course, people will share, MS will absorb, MS will add to the code and say.....nope, not sharing this stuff, SUCKERS!!!

    it's sad.....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke