+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 35

Thread: PIII vs Celeron

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    11

    PIII vs Celeron

    Hi. Quick question...
    Which is faster a Celeron 1.1GHz or a P3-800EB?
    Where can I get results?

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member LostBok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    613
    Interesting question.... I forget, is the 800EB a 133Mhz FSB or 100Mhz?

    Either way I should imagine the Celeron can outpace the P3 in sheer number crunching, however the P3 does have more cache and does have SSE on its side - I think you'd find the P3 would pull level or slightly ahead with some applications, but the fact that the Celeron is a third quicker in clock-speed would probably mean it would be the faster. Are these two identical spec machines you're comapring or different boxes or are you looking to upgrade your CPU?

  3. #3
    Senior Member Banti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1999
    Location
    No Longer at Sysopt
    Posts
    903
    P3 letters

    E= .18 micron
    B=133 FSB
    EB= Both

    Banti

  4. #4
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    Celeron 1.1GHz uses Coppermine128 core, hence, it supports SSE.
    1.1GHz/100MHz FSB Celeron would be faster then 800MHz/133MHz FSB PentiumIII EB.

    Best Regards ...

  5. #5
    Senior Member LostBok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    613
    ND, so let me get this straight.... the only differences between Celeron128's and PIII's are more cache (128k for coppermine, 384k for Tualatin) and a slightly faster BUS speed?

  6. #6
    Senior Member LostBok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    613
    I thought it was only the Celeron II's that used SSE, but the pre-cache Celeron's and Celeron A's (original 128k cache) did not...
    not sure about the earlier FC-PGA Celeron's though...

    You're probably right though
    I've not been looking that closely at CPU's for a while now...

    If that be the case, I should be able to put two Celeron 800's or 1Ghz's on riser-cards and then into my old dual-BX motherboard and they should work fine - my mobo did definitely take the CeleronA's...


    [This message has been edited by LostBok (edited 09-06-2001).]

  7. #7
    Ultimate Member otheos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Cardiff, Wales, UK
    Posts
    2,531
    Sorry, but the only celerons that will work on SMP are the older (up to 533Mhz). Celeron II have their SMP disabled so I guess you're back to P3.

  8. #8
    Senior Member LostBok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    613
    Thanks Otheos.... my credit-card's been burning a hole in my pocket all morning and I've keyed in that Scan phone number a few times today already (I find web-ordering too easy and highly addictive).... I was SOOOOO close to ordering a pair of Celery 800's (£47+VAT) and the riser cards.... I was sure they'd work.... are you sure the newer Celeron's are non-MP?? Why did they disable that?

  9. #9
    Ultimate Member otheos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Cardiff, Wales, UK
    Posts
    2,531
    I am positive I'm affraid.

    Why they disabled it? So that you buy a P3 of course!

  10. #10
    Senior Member LostBok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    613
    Ok, thanks... saved me a lot of frustration and heart-ache.... I guess

    Please, don't take offence, but I'm putting a topic out asking what the story is... just hoping somebody has some brain-waves... or cunning plans for these, otherwise I reckon its off to a dual Athlon once th emobo's come down in price... the CPU's are SO much cheaper and also faster than their equivalent PIII's... somehow I'm expecting Intel to be quite greedy when those Tualatin core PIII's hit the mass-market... not theat I'm a pessimist or anything

    Is it s pin-disable or have they actually disabled something on the chip? I'd be running these in a BX Slot1 mobo initially, so could mess around with the riser cards quite a bit

    [This message has been edited by LostBok (edited 09-06-2001).]

  11. #11
    Ultimate Member otheos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 1999
    Location
    Cardiff, Wales, UK
    Posts
    2,531
    No offence taken, I know exactly the feeling! (ok sure, but has anyoned tried it??)

    That's the fun of it!

  12. #12
    Senior Member LostBok's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    613
    Hellmund backed you up and then dug out some article from RobRich about it all... looks liek you're right... I'm not gonan try it now, but could well have a go when I've got money to burn and a LOT of time to dig around for the more detailed CPU specs...

    Or I could just buy the riser cards and then try to persuade two friends to upgrade to the same speed Celeron2's at the same time, just so that I can test them first... bit of a long shot, but the only way its gonan happen at the moment!

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Czech
    Posts
    10
    Celeron 800 has 10ns clock period
    PIII at 133FSB has 7.5ns for executing

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Brisbane / Queensland, Australia, Beautiful one day Fabulous the next.
    Posts
    2
    Try this site for more info; http://www.tomshardware.com/

    Go to Tom's Guide click on CPU and get everything you need to know!

    G'Day Luke.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    80
    I think previosuly I read from a review testing these 2 CPU; Celeron600 & PIII600E, both were similar close in results obtain, thus if now with the better FSB at 100Mhz, I feels that that this Celeron 1.2 surely surpassed even the PIII-1GHz!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke