+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Gainesville, Fl, USA
    Posts
    62

    Where to put my 12X burner

    Hey guys i recently bought my girlfriend for her birthday a 12X burner and i quite dont know where to put it. I could put it in her 500 celeron with 128 ram, which i did and it was very flaky(many coasters and buffer was running at 10% or less throughout the whole burn process.)Or i could give her my spare P3 350 with 192 MB of ram. My question is, would the P3 computer be a better burning machine as apposed to the celeron 500 that my girlfriend is currently running. I realize that i would be loosing clock speed but i would also be gaining FSB, and a larger processor cache. Any input would be greatly appreciated.

  2. #2
    Mod w/ an attitude Sterling_Aug's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1999
    Location
    Schuylkill Haven, PA 1797
    Posts
    12,786
    I have a real nice dual P3-750 server just waiting for a kewl burner like that...LOL

    What operating systems do each machine have?

    Your problem seesm to be more related to the software than the hardware. Upgrade to the deluxe versions.

  3. #3
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    P3-350 ? Are you sure ?
    Does your burner supports BURN-proof technology ? In that case, you can even install it on P166 with 32MB RAM
    Generally, both computers will work fine with the burner, even if it's not BURN-proof, just try installing it as Master.

    Best Regards ...

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Gainesville, Fl, USA
    Posts
    62
    Hey there guys, sorry ND, i meant a P2 350. Both of the computers will be running Win98. And no the burner does not have burn proof technology. Its kind of an El chepo burner. Its an LG 12X Burner with an 8MB buffer. With that said the Celeron was really struggling making a simple audio cd using easy cd creator at 12X. That buffer never stayed above 10%. Im just curious if the Pentium II processor should be able to run the burner more efficently with a faster front side bus and a higher processor cache than the celeron. Thanks for the replies.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Denver, CO, USA
    Posts
    28
    I know you said it's a 12x burner, but do you still make coasters if you burn at a slower speed? How many other processes are running in the background?

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2001
    Location
    Gainesville, Fl, USA
    Posts
    62
    It seems to work better at slower speeds 8X as far as the buffer use is concerned. Its just when its at 12X that it runs very flaky. And whatever speed i run it at i have nothing running.

  7. #7
    Member Cody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Posts
    493
    Why not just install a small linux system (without X) for CD-Burning? It will almost never make Coasters.

  8. #8
    Evil Lurks NDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Inner Mongolia
    Posts
    6,576
    Better stay with Celery, defragment your HD, kill every possible background processes, and try not to go beyond 8x burning speed, 12x might be too high, even with 8MB buffer.

    Best Regards ...

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke