+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: scsi

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    antioch, cali
    Posts
    690

    scsi

    can someone please enlighten me about some scsi questions i have?
    1. do you have a scsi harddrive/controller card? if you do, can you please tell me how much you payed for both, and how fast they are?
    2. could someone tell me where i can find a scsi harddrive/controller card with this setup: 9gb 10-15k rpm ultra160 ??? *please*?
    thanks,
    andré.


    [This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 06-21-2001).]

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,083
    Hi

    1. Yes. I have the SCSI RAID controller Adaptec 2100s with 2 IBM 36LZX (10000rpm, 4MB cache).
    How much did I pay for? You don't want to know...
    How fast are they? well, configured in RAID0, they are too fast.
    2. SCSI controllers? Adaptec , LSI Logic , Tekram
    SCSI HD? IBM 36Z15 or Seagate X15

    Stan

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    antioch, cali
    Posts
    690
    thanks stan

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    antioch, cali
    Posts
    690
    hey stan, does this card http://www.adaptecstore.com/dr/v2/ec_MAIN.Entry10?V1=251387&PN= 1&SP=10023&xid=14948&DSP=&CUR=840&CACHE_ID=29400 work with this hd http://www.seagate.com/cda/products/...21,243,00.html ??

    [This message has been edited by AndreRIO (edited 06-21-2001).]

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    antioch, cali
    Posts
    690
    does it? (i am new to scsi)

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    80
    I have a 3 channel MEGARAID controller that I paid $150 for. I already had the cache memory, so I didn't have to spend more to get cache. I have 3 IBM DNES 318350 disks in a raid 5, each costing $180. How fast is it? Well, it is definitely faster than anything i have ever seen, but I was not so much concerned with speed as I was was redundancy. Of course, the speed is nice to have. It really shines over IDE raid configurations in multiple simultaneous read/write scenarios. IDE will choke a bit in those situations.

    As for your third question, the answer is most likely yes. Adaptec and Seagate make excellent products that have worked well together in the past.

  7. #7
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 1999
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    1,083
    Yep, they will work just fine...

    Stan

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    32
    Hi AndreRIO,

    Sounds as though you're ready to immerse yourself in SCSI technology. I'm using the Adaptec 29160N adapter with two Seagate Ultra 160 Barracudas and a Plextor SCSI CD-RW. The 29160N might be just the card you're looking for. Roughly $250 as a kit with software, cables, manuals etc. Make sure you don't take anything less than the Adaptec kit as quality cables are vital with this technology. Good luck!

    John Lowell

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member NDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    5,020
    I'm also using an Adaptec 29160N with a Seagate Ultra 160 10,00rpm hard disk. I think it may be a wiser choice to get the Adaptec 29160 instead of the 29160N since it supports 64Bit PCI, who knows, maybe all mainboards in the near future will have 64bit PCI ports. And the cost difference between 29160N and 29160 is quite small.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Posts
    32
    NDC,

    Interesting. I was encouraged to consider 64 bit by a particularly engaging Seagate customer service employee at the time I was purchasing my ultra 160s. A few questions: (1) is not the 29160 considered primarily a server card, (2) your 10,000 RPM drives, are they not Cheetahs and (3) if they are Cheetahs, are you having any problem whatsoever with noise?

    Regards,

    John Lowell

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member NDC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2000
    Location
    Burbank, CA
    Posts
    5,020
    Hi, John

    (1) 29160 is rated as a SCSI card for mid-range server environments. The reason it's considered a "Server" card is because it has 64bit/66Mhz interface. As you may already know, most high-end multi-processor server/workstation mainboards usually utilize 64bit/66Mhz PCI ports unlike uni-processor mainboards that have 32bit/33Mhz PCI interface. The 29160 is also backwards compatible with 32bit PCI interface... 29160 isn't only used for servers, they are used for multi-processor workstations as well...


    2) Yes, my SCSI drive is a Seagate Cheetah (Ultra160). I have no problems whatsoever with it in terms of performance, reliability or noise. I use a lot of aaplications with heavy I/O data, and it sounds smooth. It's the quietest drive I have on my systems. On the other hand, my Western Digital which I've been using for over 2 years now sounds like a dang woodpecker when it's being heavily accesssed. That's what I noticed about WD drives, they're rather noisy compared to most other HDD's..

    3) I've been using Seagate SCSI HDD's for quite some time now. I currently use 3 cheetah's and they all are very reliable.

    [This message has been edited by NDC (edited 06-23-2001).]

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke