+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Monterrey, NL, México
    Posts
    584
    Installing another drive is far better. Making another partition only makes the hard drive flush the cache and jump to a far place of the HD.

    Thanks Donkey, good thing I have Partition Magic to slice and glue partitions [img]/forum/smile.gif[/img]

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    Monterrey, NL, México
    Posts
    584

    Win9x Swapfile ala Linux

    Since linux uses another partition and format for its swapfile, why not try it for win9x?

    I plan to make a fat16 partition of about 500MB to put the swapfile, explorer and netscape cache, etc.

    I would like to know for any performance gain or loss of it. If anyone else want to try it let me know how it went for ya. [img]/forum/smile.gif[/img]

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 1999
    Location
    Leeds, England
    Posts
    415
    It should speed things up as you will decrease the amount of fragmenting going on on your system.
    A better idea though might be to put a swap file on a seperate HD if you have an old drive lying around or another drive in you system. As it would be able to write to this drive independently to what is going on with the other main drive.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke