+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member Bazango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    403

    Symmetric/asymmetric multiprocessing

    In some old postings here, there was some discussion about using multiprocessors with Linux. The content of the discussion left me convinced that Linux actually handled multiprocessing even beyond what WinNT could do.

    However all of the published references on Linux (Que, Sams, etc.) make no reference to multiprocessing. They all do make references to multitasking, though. I talked to a casual but reliable source for computing and he said that Linux does NOT handle multiprocessing.

    Can anyone explain further what is going on? Is there something I am missing that does not show in the index of the published manuals? A cited reference on the subject might clear this up once and for all for me.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    574
    Linux does SMP. I have it in a dual P133 box and Linux uses both CPUs. I seem to recall it can only use up to four CPUs at once but that might be old news. It all depends on the program you run. If the program is set up for multiple CPUs, it gets them. Linux still passes on some overhead to the idle CPU if the program doesn't use it. The RC5 program uses multiple CPUs if you want to take a look at "top" and see what your CPUs are doing.

    This URL has some of the more common uses for SMP.

    http://www.linux.org/projects/scientific.html

  3. #3
    Middle Age Member
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    3,295
    I just finished reading that the 2.2 kernel is fully SMP capable (Caldera's OL2.2 manual pg160), and I think I remember reading somewhere that the new kernel supports up to 16 processors.

  4. #4
    Member Bazango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    403
    Well, I'm convinced. The Que special edition manual has a chapter about Multiple Processes, I guess that must be where this faculty is managed. And there is also the distinction of multiprocessors using shared memory.

    I have this recuring fantasy about setting up two or three machines old 486s to speed up regular desktop operations along with my own multiprocessor machine.

  5. #5
    Middle Age Member
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Posts
    3,295
    That sounds like a great project. About a year ago I read where one of the universities here in SO CAL had linked up about 100 PCs and created a crude super computer using Linux OS

    [This message has been edited by CMonster (edited 06-18-99).]

  6. #6
    Member Zacko10000's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 1999
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    202
    You will have to tell me how that goes, I've also got a bunch of 486s, hmm...maybe I have found a use for them. How would one go about setting this up, do you just network them and set some perameters so they will go into a multi-processing mode?


  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 1999
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Posts
    574
    All that info can be found at the link I posted earlier.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke