101 fps in quake 2 at 640*480:)

[Death To Mel]

I did a timedemo test using demo1.dm2 at 640*480 and got 101fps. I can't play it at this preformance level though because I had to set my monitor to 120hz. and the image was all squished in the middle out the screen. In other word my monitor cannot support the 120hz [img]/forum/frown.gif[/img] Test done with 3dfx voodoo3 3000.

[AuraEdge]

I got 97 on my TNT 110/120 - Cel 550
Cant quit hit the big 100 tho...Ah well

[Martin]

Guys guys
who cares about 640 resolution
put some scores at 1024 or 1280

[Brian48]

OK. PIII500/256mb RAM/CL Annihilator

1024x768x16bit w/3Finger's hi-vis tweak

Demo1.dm2 = 125.4 fps [img]/forum/smile.gif[/img]

I'll let you know what I get with the DDR version when I get it.

[This message has been edited by Brian48 (edited 11-12-1999).]

[Pat Kennedy]

640 x 480 resolution is almost pointless now. These days 800 x 600 is easily playable. 1024x 768 is usually fine too. Still 640x 480 is fun to see how high the fps go [img]/forum/smile.gif[/img]

Pat

[LockDown]

hehe.. im running a amd k6-2 450, 64mb ram,and a v3 3000..

in 800x600x16 i get 137 fps
in 1024x768x16 i get 117 fps

=) gatta love the v3.

laterz

[LockDown]

ooops double post =)

[This message has been edited by LockDown (edited 11-15-1999).]

[bigslammer]

wow lockdown those are some impressive scores. I guess i didn't give the k6-2 enough credit. man if you had 128megs you'd be really styling. have you tried unreal timedemo

[LockDown]

nope.. i havent really liked unreal that much.. QuAkE is more my style =)

i still dont understand why i score so low on 3dmark99. I get *gulp* below average? what gives. Oh well.. maybe when i get more ram my scores will go up.