+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    Boston, MA, USA
    Posts
    1

    Overclocking Celerons: 300A vs. 333 vs. 400

    Hi,
    I am just about to by a new system which I will overclock. I am getting a BH6 based system. I am trying to decide which Celeron CPU is best for me. I can afford pretty much any of the above, but I want to get the one that is most reliable for overclocking. I know that this varies widely by chip, but would a 400 overclock better than a 300 because of its higher spec? Oh yeah, also how big is the difference between retail and OEM parts. My store mainly carries OEM and I am not sure how much this will impact my efforts. Thanks.

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Posts
    3
    The 300A seems to be the O/Cers choice due to its relatively low multiplier. more than 90% can manage the 100;103mhz FSB. The 'new' Celerons seem not to have much difficultly running in the 450 mhz range, 500+ is a different story however, and 550+ seems to be a dream more than a reality (stable that is).

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke