Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Comparing Passmark CPU Marks of old and new AMD-Prozessors of mine on Gigabyte

  1. #1
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2001
    Location
    Basel-Switzerland
    Posts
    4,100

    Comparing Passmark CPU Marks of old and new AMD-Prozessors of mine on Gigabyte

    http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.php
    I see my old and new AMD- processor on that list.
    On gigabyte list for my Ga-Alive dual sata2 they are at the end(slowest speed) and the other one ontop(speediest supported CPU)


    New one: AMD Phenom II x4 965 (AM3 Socket)-(Passmark CPU =4272)
    Old slow one: AMD Sempron 3000+ (Passmark CPU= 433)

    That would be a huge speed-shift right?
    I wonder why i didnt have the idea of updating earlier.
    Cooling
    I have seen huge coolers for that new processor where its fan is blowing/sucking from an angle.
    Could the hot air better be removed? actual slow CPU is around 38-40°C.

    Minimum riquirements for Windows 10:
    http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/foru...nts-to-run-it/
    That means it would be no good idea to test w10 with the actual slow processor.
    www.stereopan.org
    underreconstruction
    3Daeropanorama
    was: 3DMarspanoramas
    3DVideos
    www.3dmedia.ch
    www.3dmusic.ch

  2. #2
    Lifetime Friend of Staff
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Sheboygan, WI
    Posts
    3,921
    Going from single core to multi core, in some applications, you definitely will see a difference.

    Scan pictures with a single core takes the same length of time as scanning 4 with a multi core.

    Converting a 3 GB AVi to VOB went from 55 minutes to 15 minutes.

    Just some change I took special notes on.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •