+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mauritius
    Posts
    42

    compatibilty between asus A9550 and windows vista

    i would like to purchase an agp graphics card Asus A9550 but do not know if it is compatible with win vista. what do u think ?

    it is a low budget card around $60 but i am on a very tight budget.
    does it support win vista?

    thanks

  2. #2
    Stark Raving MOD Midknyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    21,900
    If it uses the ATI 9550 chipset and has 128MB ram, it should run on vista.

    Are you sure you want to run vista on an older system? Unless you have at least 2GB of ram, I'd stick with XP.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mauritius
    Posts
    42
    i will be opting for a dual boot system with win xp/windows vista and i will be mainly using win vista for learning purposes.
    i already have a amd duron processor @ 800 mghz and 768 sd ram pc133.

    one thing that i forget to mention is that it indicates on the box that it is compatible with only winxp/2000!! so do u think dwld catalyst drivers will help me

    where can i download the catalyst drivers for this card ?
    Last edited by gundja; 09-19-2008 at 10:05 PM.

  4. #4
    Stark Raving MOD Midknyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    21,900
    That system is not going to handle vista. cpu is way too slow and 768 ram ain't gonna cut it.

    Catalyst drivers are on the ATI website.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mauritius
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Midknyte
    That system is not going to handle vista. cpu is way too slow and 768 ram ain't gonna cut it.
    i ran windows vista upgrade advisor on my pc and it confirms that everything is ok except my video card.

    i just got another alternative for my graphics card tornado geforce fx 5200.


    which one would you recommend bewteen the two?

  6. #6
    Stark Raving MOD Midknyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    21,900
    The 9550 is better.

    Whatever, dude. I've run Vista on lower systems and it will crawl.

  7. #7
    Moderator
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Elma, Washington
    Posts
    2,636
    amd duron processor @ 800 mghz and 768 sd ram pc133

    Expect to be very, very disappointed with your experience!

    Best bet, a dual core cpu with 2 GB of ram minimum.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mauritius
    Posts
    42
    finally bought the card today and everything is ok under win xp.

    so i decided to install win vista in another partition and then, my journey to hell begins.
    first attempt ,blue screen of death error ---page fault in non paged area.

    after searching on google, many users reporting that bad ram may be the culprit.so i test my memory during 2hrs with memtest. result is ok ,no errors.

    2nd attempt,bsod error: 0*0000008E

    3rd attempt : try a clean installation ,remove win xp .winvista still crashes during installation ....expanding files 37% and bsod errror ---bad pool caller
    stop 0*000000c2

    you know what ,vista is not for me . i have no clue why vista is crashing during installation and i will be definitely sticking with xp for life.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Lgbpop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Yes
    Posts
    948
    A Duron with 768MB SDRAM is good enough for 9x or 2000, and adequate for XP. I sure wouldn't try to put Vista on that; you really need more recent hardware for Vista.
    Thank God we're not getting all of the government we're paying for!

  10. #10
    Stark Raving MOD Midknyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    21,900
    I said in my first reply that you should stick with XP on that system.

    I'm not a Vista advocate by any means. However, I don't think it is fair to bash Vista if you are trying to install it on inferior hardware.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke