POST YOUR 3DMARK2005 SCORES HERE!!!! - Page 4
Page 4 of 33 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 481

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK2005 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. #46
    Ultimate Member Baddog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    In a Cat 6 Cable
    Posts
    2,571
    I tried the 4.10's and lost 200 points.
    Improvise - Adapt - Overcome
    SafeSearch is off

  2. #47
    Stark Raving MOD Midknyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    22,166
    The 4.10s are supposed to be the "magic bullet" for the x800s. if you're not using an x800, then that's probably why you saw a drop in score.

  3. #48
    Member cheeseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Concord,Ca
    Posts
    342
    i wonder if is built on the "doom 3 " engine where you can"t get 10000 ?????
    buy the cheeseman

  4. #49
    Member cheeseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Concord,Ca
    Posts
    342
    i none of us can get 10000 for now!!
    buy the cheeseman

  5. #50
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    Originally posted by cheeseman
    i wonder if is built on the "doom 3 " engine where you can"t get 10000 ?????
    what do you mean?

    i think, that they wanted to maske a benchmark for the next generation of gpus. like they already did in 3dmark03.

    i think, that it will take at least 3 years until games come out, which have similar framrates on x800/6800 cards.

  6. #51
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    129
    i did it last night...don't remember exactly...it was in the 2500 range.

    p4 2.4 ghz 533 FSB
    asus p4pe board
    1 GB pc2700
    9800 pro

    everything stock. i don't get this benchmark at all...i was looking to upgrade to a 64 bit 3200 pc3200...only costs like 340 bucks to do so now...but i don't see that much of an increase in some of your guys rigs. perhaps i should just wait some more...

  7. #52
    Ultimate Member Baddog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    In a Cat 6 Cable
    Posts
    2,571
    Is it just me , or is 3D Mark 2005 a little on the boring side......
    Improvise - Adapt - Overcome
    SafeSearch is off

  8. #53
    PC Aficionado MJCfromCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WPI, Worcester MA
    Posts
    4,724
    I just don't like how you can't get any of the additional tests like you have in '03 and '01, you only get the video and cpu tests now for the free version.
    2x Dell 2007WFP | A8N-E | X2 4600+ | 8800GTS 640 MB | 2 GB DDR400 | 3.07 TB | CD-RW/DVD±RW/DVD-RAM
    My Website | My DeviantART | My Spyware/Virus Removal Guide

  9. #54
    Ultimate Member Magua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Cape Cod, Mass
    Posts
    1,609
    i don't get this benchmark at all...i was looking to upgrade to a 64 bit 3200 pc3200...only costs like 340 bucks to do so now...but i don't see that much of an increase in some of your guys rigs. perhaps i should just wait some more...
    The 3dMark series is mostly a GPU benchark. Other components do make a difference, but the video card is 90% of the score. If you look at other more CPU intensive benchmarks you will see a much higher performance from the higher end AMD chips.

  10. #55
    Stark Raving MOD Midknyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Arkham Asylum
    Posts
    22,166
    I only run the video tests because, as Magua stated, it is mainly a GPU test.

    Has anyone tried comparing the original 3dmark05 to the 1.1.0 patched version?

  11. #56
    PC Aficionado MJCfromCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    WPI, Worcester MA
    Posts
    4,724
    Original 3dmark05: 2500

    Patched 3dmark05: 2505

    Not too much of a difference for me.
    2x Dell 2007WFP | A8N-E | X2 4600+ | 8800GTS 640 MB | 2 GB DDR400 | 3.07 TB | CD-RW/DVD±RW/DVD-RAM
    My Website | My DeviantART | My Spyware/Virus Removal Guide

  12. #57
    Member Fluffy_624's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Aylesbury, UK
    Posts
    71
    2487
    xp2500m@ 12x200
    2x512MB crucial pc2700@200mhz
    9800pro@stock

    I was a bit gutted at first but reading the rest of the posts here its not too bad.

  13. #58
    Member Zephyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    in front of my comp =D
    Posts
    41
    yeah, seems like lower scores are usual. i wasnt really into benchmarking when 3dmark 03 came out, so i dont know what peoples original scores were, but i figure that manufacturers, mainly gpu manufacturers will use this as a mark for themselves, and within a year or so there will be a gpu capable of getting the 20k+ scores

  14. #59
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Midlands UK
    Posts
    6
    Hi all, look out newbie on the block

    Scored 1177 with...

    AMD 2600+
    ASUS A7N8X
    768Mb Ram soz not sure of frequency
    9700Pro

    I think it's fair to say my system got a good beatin by this monster of a test. Max frame rate i saw was 13, lowest during cpu tests bottomed out at 0

    I did have a few extra system processes running which i'm sure if i turned them off would have made a world of difference

    It was nice to see the 9700 can still "run" (maybe "slow stroll" would be more appropriate) this type of thing given it's age though

  15. #60
    Ultimate Member porsch1909's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    2,121
    i got a surprisingly high score....as a matter of fact im number 2!!! always 2 never one i will OC with beast and get a 4000 out of it though.


    system spec : -

    2.8 Ghz C 800 fsb running at 2.8 Ghz
    1024 MB of RAM (Generic)
    X800 pro not OCed



    and i gotta 3700 that is a pretty good score i would think, but i wont worry yoshi will come soon and beat us all to a pulp lol. the benckmark was a very interesting slide show at the CPU tests though lol.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •