+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16
  1. #1
    Member CaptHandsome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    390

    DVD-R DVD+R whats the difference?

    Just wanna know the difference between a plus and a minus

  2. #2
    Extreme Member! BipolarBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Norton Noo Joisey
    Posts
    41,476
    Go to bed!

    DVD-RW is more compatible with livingroom DVD players (set-top). That's about it. It seems that it's easier to get +RW drives working at 8x, judged by the latest commercial offerings.
    MS MCP, MCSE

  3. #3
    Member CaptHandsome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    390
    Do +RW drives not burn in the same format as -RW?

  4. #4
    Ultimate Member rmanet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Location
    Sunny San Diego
    Posts
    2,653
    DVD-R and DVD-RW
    DVD-R/W was the first DVD recording format released that was compatible with standalone DVD Players.
    DVD-R is a non-rewriteable format and it is compatible with about 92% of all DVD Players and most DVD-ROMs.
    DVD-RW is a rewriteable format and it is compatible with about 75% of all DVD Players and most DVD-ROMs.
    DVD-R/W supports single side 4.7 GB* DVDs(called DVD-5) and double side 9.4 GB* DVDs(called DVD-10).
    These formats are supported by DVDForum.

    DVD+R and DVD+RW
    DVD+R/W has some "better" features than DVD-R/W such as lossless linking and both CAV and CLV writing.
    DVD+R is a non-rewritable format and it is compatible with about 86% of all DVD Players and most DVD-ROMs.
    DVD+RW is a rewritable format and is compatible with about 75% of all DVD Players and most DVD-ROMs.
    DVD+R/W supports single side 4.7 GB* DVDs(called DVD-5) and double side 9.4 GB* DVDs(called DVD-10).

  5. #5
    Member CaptHandsome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    390
    How come DVD burners have the option to do both -R and +R?

  6. #6
    Extreme Member! BipolarBill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Norton Noo Joisey
    Posts
    41,476
    Because YOU, the consumer, demanded it. Why else?
    MS MCP, MCSE

  7. #7
    Member CaptHandsome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    390
    *sigh* Me the consumer wants to slap the confusing manufactures. But alas, w/out manufacturers where would we buy our toys? Dell?? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

  8. #8
    Banned Johnny Fist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    THE PICKLE FACTORY
    Posts
    2,259
    I don't know where people have formulated their opinion that -r's are more compatable. From what I've seen it really makes no difference if you use + or - for movie backups. I tend to prefer plus myself, with no logical explanation why. I'm sure eventually one of these days one format is going to go the way of the betamax.

  9. #9
    Ultimate Member bassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    2,384
    Originally posted by Johnny Fist
    I don't know where people have formulated their opinion that -r's are more compatable.
    Because a domestic DVD player comptibility statistic was (and is being) made in order to test both formats


    I'm sure eventually one of these days one format is going to go the way of the betamax.
    Eventually...I don't see why we need two formats if, generally, all drives converge towards compatibility with one or other, or both, formats - the format that offers more (speed and media pricing ), wins.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    66
    The reason most people assume that -R is more compatible is because they are. For example, my Panasonic RP62K Progressive Scan player with the Sage Faroudja chipset will not play ANY +R's or +RW's, only -R's and -RW's. Although rare these days, many players fall into this same boat.

  11. #11
    Member saimyc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2000
    Location
    Da Bronx, NY
    Posts
    190
    Ah ha I see now

    something like in the 70's when VHS and BataMax battled

    Beta was actually better, VHS won out with the consumer

    Which format do you think will win here? or will we end up with ±

  12. #12
    Member CaptHandsome's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    390
    Is one able to store raw data on a DVD, or does it have to be video?

  13. #13
    Ultimate Member Direct1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    2,470
    Originally posted by saimyc
    Which format do you think will win here? or will we end up with ±
    At this point, I think you'd be foolish not to buy a dual-format model if you're in the market for one. Good luck!

  14. #14
    Ultimate Member bassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    2,384
    Originally posted by CaptHandsome
    Is one able to store raw data on a DVD, or does it have to be video?
    You can record all the things you recorded into CDs

  15. #15
    Banned Johnny Fist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    THE PICKLE FACTORY
    Posts
    2,259
    Just to clarify...yes, you can burn non-video data to both + and - DVDs.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke