5 posts per page?? That's an overkill.

[LiLRiceBoi]

I agree w/ otheos. Even though i dont post here that often, I do spend quite a bit of time reading the posts.

I think that this is just a little bit too much trouble and hassle to go back and forth.

I would also appreciate it if you would allow more posts per page.

[deltaf508]

Especially if you have a 56K

Next Page....
Next Page....
Next Page....

My little modem is smokin' already

Gary

[This message has been edited by deltaf508 (edited 08-22-2001).]

[deltaf508]

Sorry for the double post

[This message has been edited by deltaf508 (edited 08-22-2001).]

[fshanda]

I just noticed this myself. Not to pleased with this change. I like all the other changes that have been made to the forum but this on is a pain in the neck. Remember, some of us are still using dialup connections. The more pages to load the slower my reading goes.

Please change it back.

Pretty Please

Fshanda

[jad1097]

I don't like it either.

[daveleau]

This is temporary. Scott is trying out a few things and is looking to make some changes. This one though, is a temporary one.

Please hang on, it is all for the best and will be bigger and better soon.

Dave

[daveleau]

Moving to community

Dave

[vagpap]

Another vote against that
(Dial-up connection)

Vangelis

[otheos]

Among other changes in the forums lately I noticed this. While all the other changes were really good, the 5 posts/page format is an overkill.

With discussions going well into 10-20 posts, having to change back/forward 4-5 times is too much. I would think the server is loaded more this way.

Any chance you reconsider?

Thanks.