POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

[MrBurns]

Originally posted by PlatoonSgtElias
Let me remind that 3DMark2003 runs all on GPU (videocard) the CPU dosent madder much at all if any.
You should get 6k from stock but i guess 5500 without no OC is quite good.

Proof that by running 3DMark03 on a Athlon, which is underclocked to 500MHz (100x5 should be possible w/ every unlocked Athlon on all better boards) w/ a GeForce FX 5950 or Radeon 9800XT and compare it w/ the score on an oced Athlon XP FX-51.

[DMohler]

Latest run with new 9800XT-7092.http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1940324

[Mj_Pimp]

Thats a god like system you got there.....


Any chance you wana swap?

[MadPistol]

2.8Cghz P4
800mhz FSB
Intel 875P Mobo
Geforce FX 5900 128mb
SB Audigy 2 ZS
1 Gig Samsung PC3200 mem

Score: 5783

Considering I have a card that I only paid $200 for, it is a very respectible score. no oc. I just couldn't afford that nice little 9800xt. I wanted it so bad!

[PlatoonSgtElias]

Originally posted by MadPistol
2.8Cghz P4
800mhz FSB
Intel 875P Mobo
Geforce FX 5900 128mb
SB Audigy 2 ZS
1 Gig Samsung PC3200 mem

Score: 5783

Considering I have a card that I only paid $200 for, it is a very respectible score. no oc. I just couldn't afford that nice little 9800xt. I wanted it so bad!

maaaan that is sooo weaaak


5,854p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1978618


R9700 and an 2500+@3200+

[MadPistol]

Weak eh??? about 100 points more on a very respectible system is not weak at all. Of course if you want to make fun of my gaming monster, that's fine.

[PlatoonSgtElias]

hold on now... 3DMark2003 does not count cpu speed at all. Its the 3D Accelerator that counts there.
So looking at those scores.... my Radeon9700 beats the **** out of your FX5900


considering that my system cost a whole lot less then your Pentium system.
Pentium sucks anyways, too pricey and not that much speed gain if any.

[Mj_Pimp]

Yea penitum suck! lol moron least the Intels don't LIE about there clock speeds...and have dated FSB clocks.... whats up with that anyway,...i mean the 2800+ just for example runs at 2.2ghz...i mean why the **** call it the 2800+

Oh yea and can multitask a hole lot better and are so much more stable

Iv done some tweaking and managed to get 6513 out of my

P4 2.4C on my Radeon 9800 Pro

[PlatoonSgtElias]

heh... well if you would compare a 3.2GHz P4 and 3.2GHz AMD... i mean... itll be unfair I mean... my 2200MHz amd can beat P4 3GHz *** up pretty good.

btw moron, 3dmark2003 is not cpu related. so baisicly if u give me a r9800pro ill do 7k with it

[Mj_Pimp]

what AMD runs at 3.2ghz?... even the new 3400+ is apparently gona run at 3.2,...and i dought ur board supports it for obvious reasons.

And saying that 03 is tottally not CPU related is a bit retarded seeing as there is a CPU test...which focus's on the cpu doing almost everything if not all of the work...

and dude uv OC'ed urs to 3200+...and mines just a bog standard 2.4C!...so the scores would level...cause acording to you 03 is not cpu related....rite? lol

2.4C
ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
1Gb DDR500 Kingston HyperX
320GB HDD (1 seagate Barracuda, 1 Maxtor)
Gainward 9800 Pro 128Mb

[PlatoonSgtElias]

Originally posted by Mj_Pimp
what AMD runs at 3.2ghz?... even the new 3400+ is apparently gona run at 3.2,...and i dought ur board supports it for obvious reasons.

And saying that 03 is tottally not CPU related is a bit retarded seeing as there is a CPU test...which focus's on the cpu doing almost everything if not all of the work...

and dude uv OC'ed urs to 3200+...and mines just a bog standard 2.4C!...so the scores would level...cause acording to you 03 is not cpu related....rite? lol

2.4C
ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
1Gb DDR500 Kingston HyperX
320GB HDD (1 seagate Barracuda, 1 Maxtor)
Gainward 9800 Pro 128Mb

Im getting THE SAME SCORE with 2500+ moron.
The cpu test is for the cpu score you idiot. If you open your eyes then you can see that you get a 3DMARK score and a CPU score as well.
The first test (plane test) is somewhat more cpu related. thats all.

[bblqj78]

Can I join the argument.......


Hey Mr Elias.....

2.4C
ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
1Gb DDR500 Kingston HyperX
320GB HDD (1 seagate Barracuda, 1 Maxtor)
Gainward 9800 Pro 128Mb

Thats system....with a good bit of overclocking would leave your system (which is similar to mine) for dead!

[PlatoonSgtElias]

If you OC that r9800pro then yeah...
But im beating it @stock with my Radeon9700nonpro OC-ed

[jet.]

Bred B 1700+ @200x12.5 -2.5Ghz
1.85 vCore, 2.7 vDimm, 1.7v Chip, AGP 1.5v
NF7-S rev.2.0 BIOS 1.4b nVidia driver 2.03
TwinMos 3x256 6/3/3/2 @ DDR400 PC3200
Rad9700 NP 350/290 Cat3.10B DX 9.0b
Xaser III Aeroflow 45C +/-5
Antec 380W WD80JB/WD120JB
Z-640 19" DPro MX500 Ratpadz GS XPPro SP1
3D'03 (.340) 5,216

[MrBurns]

Originally posted by Mj_Pimp
Yea penitum suck! lol moron least the Intels don't LIE about there clock speeds...and have dated FSB clocks.... whats up with that anyway,...i mean the 2800+ just for example runs at 2.2ghz...i mean why the **** call it the 2800+

AMD doesnt lie about the clock speed. They say nowhere, that the 2800+ runs at 2.8GHz, they only say that it runs as fast as a Pentium 4 w/ 2.8GHz, which is true.

Originally posted by Mj_Pimp
Oh yea and can multitask a hole lot better and are so much more stable

You only see improvements from Hyperthreading when you do extreme multitasking like running two CPU-intensive apps at the same time, but i dont know anyone who does that. You dont get any improvements when you i.e. run IE, Outlook, Word, Excel and Internet Explorer at the same time, because these "normal" apps dont require much CPU-time. I also dont know anyone, who has othe rprograms running while gaming.

About stability: AMD-CPUs are also 100% stable when you dont oc them to high and Intel-CPUs also get unstable when you oc them too high, so there is no difference in stability between Intel and AMD.