dcsimg
Page 51 of 82 FirstFirst ... 41 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 61 ... LastLast
Results 751 to 765 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. #751
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    Originally posted by PlatoonSgtElias
    Let me remind that 3DMark2003 runs all on GPU (videocard) the CPU dosent madder much at all if any.
    You should get 6k from stock but i guess 5500 without no OC is quite good.
    Proof that by running 3DMark03 on a Athlon, which is underclocked to 500MHz (100x5 should be possible w/ every unlocked Athlon on all better boards) w/ a GeForce FX 5950 or Radeon 9800XT and compare it w/ the score on an oced Athlon XP FX-51.
    Last edited by MrBurns; 01-22-2004 at 10:20 PM.

  2. #752
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    81
    Latest run with new 9800XT-7092.http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1940324

  3. #753
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    75
    Thats a god like system you got there.....


    Any chance you wana swap?

  4. #754
    Ultimate Member MadPistol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In your thoughts, or AL
    Posts
    1,359
    2.8Cghz P4
    800mhz FSB
    Intel 875P Mobo
    Geforce FX 5900 128mb
    SB Audigy 2 ZS
    1 Gig Samsung PC3200 mem

    Score: 5783

    Considering I have a card that I only paid $200 for, it is a very respectible score. no oc. I just couldn't afford that nice little 9800xt. I wanted it so bad!

  5. #755
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Estonia... Mafia land
    Posts
    185
    Originally posted by MadPistol
    2.8Cghz P4
    800mhz FSB
    Intel 875P Mobo
    Geforce FX 5900 128mb
    SB Audigy 2 ZS
    1 Gig Samsung PC3200 mem

    Score: 5783

    Considering I have a card that I only paid $200 for, it is a very respectible score. no oc. I just couldn't afford that nice little 9800xt. I wanted it so bad!

    maaaan that is sooo weaaak


    5,854p http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1978618


    R9700 and an 2500+@3200+


  6. #756
    Ultimate Member MadPistol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    In your thoughts, or AL
    Posts
    1,359
    Weak eh??? about 100 points more on a very respectible system is not weak at all. Of course if you want to make fun of my gaming monster, that's fine.

  7. #757
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Estonia... Mafia land
    Posts
    185
    hold on now... 3DMark2003 does not count cpu speed at all. Its the 3D Accelerator that counts there.
    So looking at those scores.... my Radeon9700 beats the **** out of your FX5900


    considering that my system cost a whole lot less then your Pentium system.
    Pentium sucks anyways, too pricey and not that much speed gain if any.
    Last edited by PlatoonSgtElias; 01-29-2004 at 11:58 PM.

  8. #758
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    75
    Yea penitum suck! lol moron least the Intels don't LIE about there clock speeds...and have dated FSB clocks.... whats up with that anyway,...i mean the 2800+ just for example runs at 2.2ghz...i mean why the **** call it the 2800+

    Oh yea and can multitask a hole lot better and are so much more stable

    Iv done some tweaking and managed to get 6513 out of my

    P4 2.4C on my Radeon 9800 Pro
    Last edited by Mj_Pimp; 01-30-2004 at 04:16 AM.

  9. #759
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Estonia... Mafia land
    Posts
    185
    heh... well if you would compare a 3.2GHz P4 and 3.2GHz AMD... i mean... itll be unfair I mean... my 2200MHz amd can beat P4 3GHz *** up pretty good.

    btw moron, 3dmark2003 is not cpu related. so baisicly if u give me a r9800pro ill do 7k with it

  10. #760
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    75
    what AMD runs at 3.2ghz?... even the new 3400+ is apparently gona run at 3.2,...and i dought ur board supports it for obvious reasons.

    And saying that 03 is tottally not CPU related is a bit retarded seeing as there is a CPU test...which focus's on the cpu doing almost everything if not all of the work...

    and dude uv OC'ed urs to 3200+...and mines just a bog standard 2.4C!...so the scores would level...cause acording to you 03 is not cpu related....rite? lol

    2.4C
    ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
    1Gb DDR500 Kingston HyperX
    320GB HDD (1 seagate Barracuda, 1 Maxtor)
    Gainward 9800 Pro 128Mb
    Last edited by Mj_Pimp; 01-30-2004 at 05:02 AM.

  11. #761
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Estonia... Mafia land
    Posts
    185
    Originally posted by Mj_Pimp
    what AMD runs at 3.2ghz?... even the new 3400+ is apparently gona run at 3.2,...and i dought ur board supports it for obvious reasons.

    And saying that 03 is tottally not CPU related is a bit retarded seeing as there is a CPU test...which focus's on the cpu doing almost everything if not all of the work...

    and dude uv OC'ed urs to 3200+...and mines just a bog standard 2.4C!...so the scores would level...cause acording to you 03 is not cpu related....rite? lol

    2.4C
    ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
    1Gb DDR500 Kingston HyperX
    320GB HDD (1 seagate Barracuda, 1 Maxtor)
    Gainward 9800 Pro 128Mb
    Im getting THE SAME SCORE with 2500+ moron.
    The cpu test is for the cpu score you idiot. If you open your eyes then you can see that you get a 3DMARK score and a CPU score as well.
    The first test (plane test) is somewhat more cpu related. thats all.

  12. #762
    Ultimate Member bblqj78's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,187
    Can I join the argument.......


    Hey Mr Elias.....

    2.4C
    ASUS P4P800 Deluxe
    1Gb DDR500 Kingston HyperX
    320GB HDD (1 seagate Barracuda, 1 Maxtor)
    Gainward 9800 Pro 128Mb

    Thats system....with a good bit of overclocking would leave your system (which is similar to mine) for dead!

  13. #763
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Estonia... Mafia land
    Posts
    185
    If you OC that r9800pro then yeah...
    But im beating it @stock with my Radeon9700nonpro OC-ed

  14. #764
    Member jet.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    455
    Bred B 1700+ @200x12.5 -2.5Ghz
    1.85 vCore, 2.7 vDimm, 1.7v Chip, AGP 1.5v
    NF7-S rev.2.0 BIOS 1.4b nVidia driver 2.03
    TwinMos 3x256 6/3/3/2 @ DDR400 PC3200
    Rad9700 NP 350/290 Cat3.10B DX 9.0b
    Xaser III Aeroflow 45C +/-5
    Antec 380W WD80JB/WD120JB
    Z-640 19" DPro MX500 Ratpadz GS XPPro SP1
    3D'03 (.340) 5,216

  15. #765
    Senior Member MrBurns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    642
    Originally posted by Mj_Pimp
    Yea penitum suck! lol moron least the Intels don't LIE about there clock speeds...and have dated FSB clocks.... whats up with that anyway,...i mean the 2800+ just for example runs at 2.2ghz...i mean why the **** call it the 2800+
    AMD doesnt lie about the clock speed. They say nowhere, that the 2800+ runs at 2.8GHz, they only say that it runs as fast as a Pentium 4 w/ 2.8GHz, which is true.



    Originally posted by Mj_Pimp
    Oh yea and can multitask a hole lot better and are so much more stable
    You only see improvements from Hyperthreading when you do extreme multitasking like running two CPU-intensive apps at the same time, but i dont know anyone who does that. You dont get any improvements when you i.e. run IE, Outlook, Word, Excel and Internet Explorer at the same time, because these "normal" apps dont require much CPU-time. I also dont know anyone, who has othe rprograms running while gaming.

    About stability: AMD-CPUs are also 100% stable when you dont oc them to high and Intel-CPUs also get unstable when you oc them too high, so there is no difference in stability between Intel and AMD.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •