POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!! - Page 5
Page 5 of 82 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 55 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. #61
    Junior Member rochacarlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    antioch, ca
    Posts
    11
    Last edited by rochacarlos; 02-13-2003 at 01:28 AM.

  2. #62
    Junior Member rochacarlos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    antioch, ca
    Posts
    11
    ^bump

  3. #63
    Ultimate Member Rugor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, Earth
    Posts
    2,694
    I've run the new 3D Mark and it leaves a bad taste in my mouth.

    It was a huge download, and didn't run all that well on my system. Yes my score was respectable, mostly because I do have a DX 9 class video card, but the experience of sitting there watching the demo through wasn't. It stuttered and the framerate dropped al the way down to 1 in places.

    Despite that I got 3217 which is pretty good, at least compared to many systems out there.

    But for this huge download-- I got much less functionality than in 3DMark2001SE. I can't save to a text file, so I can see my results properly for myself. I can't even change the resolution, or select tests not to run. In 2001 I could deselect the tests my Gf2MX couldn't run for a better comparison of simple speed against the Radeon 9500 Pro (I know the 9500 Pro owns it).

    I can't do that in 03.

    It's much less than I expected, especially after all the hype. All it needed was an FX Flow cooling system to make it perfect.
    "Dude you're getting a Dell." Obscure curse from the early 21st Century, ascribed to a minor demon-spirit known as "Stephen?" [sp].

  4. #64
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    rochacarlos, my comp rocked your system lol by like 200 point and your proc is 500+ megahertz faster LMAO proves intel sucks a fat one only thing you beat me in was cpu testing oh well ATi and AMD all the way
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  5. #65
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    Originally posted by XtReAmTwEaKist
    STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333
    Hey, hey, hey chill. Gib is nowhere near deservant of being called a stupid-***.


    Drunk, sir, I presume?

  6. #66
    Ultimate Member Beeblequix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ruins: Deus Ex Incarnate
    Posts
    1,402
    1550 3dmarks.

    I ran it at 5:40 AM before I came to work. I couln't upload the file, as the servers were probably way over-flogged. Later on I'll post a compare URL.

    I think the real reason Nvidia hates it is that it's a DX 9 bench and they don't have any DX 9 cards out yet. Seeing as I've yet to see a GfFX for sale anywhere, it doesn't really exist yet.
    I couldn't have stated it better myself. I was thinking this exact sentiment in traffic today.

    Nvidia abandoned Futuremark's ship in December because they knew their FX wasn't even close to ready to compete with Radeons today. They of course wouldn't admit defeat, so instead pulled a liberal maneuver and attacked Futuremark, stating their benchmarking tool is "inefficient" in its vertex shader engine. Then there's Nvidia not putting their FX card on the market. This just tells me that Nvidia lost this round, and it's not Futuremarks' fault.

    ▀ee▀levidia

  7. #67
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    3,922
    nvidia and AMD could both be accused of spewing massive amounts of the familiar

    F, U, D.

    lately.

  8. #68
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    F, U, D ? and caustic i was playing but still that post was BS i can only run one game with my 7500 and i get like 900 points but explain the F U D
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  9. #69
    Ultimate Member Beeblequix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Ruins: Deus Ex Incarnate
    Posts
    1,402
    ran again. 1555. Made 1 small sound card related tweak (to where it should be) and got my lousy 5 point increase.


    STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333
    rochacarlos, my comp rocked your system lol by like 200 point and your proc is 500+ megahertz faster LMAO proves intel sucks a fat one only thing you beat me in was cpu testing oh well ATi and AMD all the way
    Do you think you could show a bit more respect here? Seriously.


  10. #70
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    365
    it does make a person wonder just how much money ATi payed futuremark to release 3dMark03

  11. #71
    Ultimate Member AllGamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    16,305
    well if they did they didn't pay enough the

    cuz even ATI runs pretty **** slow in 3DMarks03

    so i'll say 3DMarks03 is really a fair bench testing software for new PCs


  12. #72
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    yea i was out of line B but still lmao....... he posted a 02, with a 7500 thats funny
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  13. #73
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    S. Williamsport, PA.,USA
    Posts
    50
    XP2100+ Tbred "B"@2286Mhz, PNY GF4 Ti4400@308/661 gets me .... 1734 3D'03 Marks.

    Pretty pictures... sort of meaningless otherwise.

  14. #74
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    3dmark 03 doesn't like my setup. Since I have a 64mb card, I get stutters every few seconds as textures are swapped into my card.

    I won't even post my score. . .
    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

  15. #75
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Has anyone with a geforce 4 tried the new 42.68s?

    Here's the link.
    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •