+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 82 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1228
  1. #31
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Originally posted by AlexGee


    Holy sh&% Giblet! 172 kbs!! wooo hooo1 Thank you, thank you, thank you
    Found the link at the overclockers.com forum.

    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

  2. #32
    Senior Member AlexGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    604
    Last edited by AlexGee; 02-12-2003 at 01:36 AM.

  3. #33
    Senior Member smelanson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Dartmouth NS, CAN
    Posts
    769
    1550
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=26608

    Syetem
    =====

    Pentium IV 2.4GHz@ 2.7GHz
    Geforce IV Ti4200 128Mb @ 275/500
    768Mb DDR333

  4. #34
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Originally posted by AlexGee
    4951! Yea baby. 5000 here I come . . .
    http://service.futuremark.com/servle...projectmanager
    That's your project url. We need the compare url.

    9700, I'm guessing?
    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

  5. #35
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  6. #36
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    oh yeah the cards at stock speed 275/275 cant OC without better core cooling and heatsinks for mem i'll get'em soon PSST 9700 pro in the mail
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  7. #37
    Senior Member AlexGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    604
    Sorry.

    5006!

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=28325

    2100+@2210 mhz (12.5 x 177), ASUS a7n8x, ATI 9500 non-pro (modded to 9700 pro)
    Last edited by AlexGee; 02-12-2003 at 01:40 AM.

  8. #38
    Senior Member Benssax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    AL,USA
    Posts
    909
    3dmark 03 must love radeon 9700's

  9. #39
    Kaameehameeehaaa! AllGamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    On Line
    Posts
    16,305

    Default Everything

    No OC, no nothing (factory default)

    935

    Performance setting 985

    Maxed Quality everything 895


  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    122
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=29427

    I used to think my system was god. Now it's been reduced to nothing.

  11. #41
    Ultimate Member omega31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    So. Cal. USA
    Posts
    2,380
    Originally posted by Giblet Plus!
    Downloading at 100 k/s here.
    If you're here for the 3dMark03 download, you've missed out. We want to thank everyone who helped us destroy some bandwidth and spread that 3dMark love.

  12. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    136
    Uhg, my system is compleatly video card bound with a result of:

    1050

    Sys:
    Athlon XP 1700
    512 MB PC 2100
    Radeon 8500 with 3.0 drivers
    Audigy 2

  13. #43
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    lol - apparently nvidia are claiming thers a fault wit 3dmark 2003 and nvidia cards giving an incorrect figure. Theres a link to it from www.actiontrip.com

    --Jakk

  14. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,185
    i mean comon the FPS we get show that we should get a low scare.

    for the space fighting demo my FPS where around 5!!! yes 5

    i given up now. this it it. my next computer will not be a gaming rig, i will buy a cheap no power 3dcard.

  15. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,185
    and why is mother nature not supported on my machine??

    what is that?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke