POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!! - Page 3
Page 3 of 82 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 1230

Thread: POST YOUR 3DMARK 2003 SCORES HERE!!!!

  1. #31
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Originally posted by AlexGee


    Holy sh&% Giblet! 172 kbs!! wooo hooo1 Thank you, thank you, thank you
    Found the link at the overclockers.com forum.

    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

  2. #32
    Senior Member AlexGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    604
    Last edited by AlexGee; 02-12-2003 at 12:36 AM.

  3. #33
    Senior Member smelanson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Dartmouth NS, CAN
    Posts
    769
    1550
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=26608

    Syetem
    =====

    Pentium IV 2.4GHz@ 2.7GHz
    Geforce IV Ti4200 128Mb @ 275/500
    768Mb DDR333

  4. #34
    Ultimate Member Giblet Plus!'s Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Evanston, IL
    Posts
    2,821
    Originally posted by AlexGee
    4951! Yea baby. 5000 here I come . . .
    http://service.futuremark.com/servle...projectmanager
    That's your project url. We need the compare url.

    9700, I'm guessing?
    This is where my signature would go if I wasn't so lazy.

  5. #35
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    STUPID *** HES USING A 7500! AND RUNNING 3dmark2001 lmao!!! ITS 3DMARK03 not 01 but my score with 9000 pro 128 1159 3dmarks Athlon XP 1600+ @1.72Ghz 786mb DDR333
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  6. #36
    Member XtReAmTwEaKist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Minneapolis
    Posts
    408
    oh yeah the cards at stock speed 275/275 cant OC without better core cooling and heatsinks for mem i'll get'em soon PSST 9700 pro in the mail
    Athlon XP 2100+ @ 2.24 (178X12.5)
    512Mb DDR400 (Corsair)
    80Gb WD 8Mb Cache
    Radeon 9000 Pro 128mb DDR
    MSI KT3 Ultra 2
    SB Live! Value
    Intel NIC
    2 CD-RW 8x4x32 & 2x4x24 (im cheap)

    TwEaKist

  7. #37
    Senior Member AlexGee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    604
    Sorry.

    5006!

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=28325

    2100+@2210 mhz (12.5 x 177), ASUS a7n8x, ATI 9500 non-pro (modded to 9700 pro)
    Last edited by AlexGee; 02-12-2003 at 12:40 AM.

  8. #38
    Senior Member Benssax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    AL,USA
    Posts
    909
    3dmark 03 must love radeon 9700's

  9. #39
    Ultimate Member AllGamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Posts
    16,305

    Default Everything

    No OC, no nothing (factory default)

    935

    Performance setting 985

    Maxed Quality everything 895


  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Central PA
    Posts
    122
    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=29427

    I used to think my system was god. Now it's been reduced to nothing.

  11. #41
    Ultimate Member omega31's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    So. Cal. USA
    Posts
    2,380
    Originally posted by Giblet Plus!
    Downloading at 100 k/s here.
    If you're here for the 3dMark03 download, you've missed out. We want to thank everyone who helped us destroy some bandwidth and spread that 3dMark love.

  12. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    136
    Uhg, my system is compleatly video card bound with a result of:

    1050

    Sys:
    Athlon XP 1700
    512 MB PC 2100
    Radeon 8500 with 3.0 drivers
    Audigy 2

  13. #43
    Ultimate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    18,631
    lol - apparently nvidia are claiming thers a fault wit 3dmark 2003 and nvidia cards giving an incorrect figure. Theres a link to it from www.actiontrip.com

    --Jakk

  14. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,185
    i mean comon the FPS we get show that we should get a low scare.

    for the space fighting demo my FPS where around 5!!! yes 5

    i given up now. this it it. my next computer will not be a gaming rig, i will buy a cheap no power 3dcard.

  15. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,185
    and why is mother nature not supported on my machine??

    what is that?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •