+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    fresno
    Posts
    201

    Upgrading from 2 small to 1 large HD..question about my backup cd's..

    Will my cd backups made with my HP cd writer be able to put all the data from both hard drives onto the one large one, or will it not be able to write the "d" drive info to the new "c" drive? I also have a question about increasing the cluster size for better performance...Does it help speed, and how is it done? Will my backed up data work on a different drive with different size clusters? Thanks a bunch!

    Steve

  2. #2
    Ultimate Member smokin1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Location
    North end of the Mojave
    Posts
    1,016
    You should be able to write to your new larger drive with your backup cd's.I see two ways to do it
    first just partition your new drive into c and d and fly at it or second if you really want one partition copy c first and then selectively place the files from your d image onto c where you want them. you may have to fix a shortcut or two with option 2 but hey...they all ran off the same registry right?
    I don't quite understand your question about going to larger clusters for better performance. Do you mean fat 32 vs fat 16?
    If this is the case fat 32 makes for smalller clusters and will save disk space for you

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 1999
    Location
    fresno
    Posts
    201
    I thought I read people discussing using fat32, but changing the cluster size for better perf...i must have missunderstood the topic

    thanks for the info smokin!

    Steve

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 1999
    Posts
    82
    Adjusting cluster size in FAT16 is useful only (as far as I'm aware) in that you save disk space by _reducing_ cluster size.

    Example: Your clusters are set to 32k in size. When you write a file that's 4k, in actuality it's taking up 32k on the disk. That's 28k wasted.
    When you expand this to the size of a hard drive, for a 2 gig drive you could end up losing 300 MEGS of drive space! This is why you'd want to reduce the cluster size.

    FAT32 is supposed to handle cluster sizes better, but I haven't played with it enough to offer advice.

    Adam

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts







New Security Features Planned for Firefox 4
Another Laptop Theft Exposes 21K Patients' Data
Oracle Hits to Road to Pitch Data Center Plans
Microsoft Preps Array of Windows Patches
Microsoft Nears IE9 Beta With Final Preview
Simplified Analytics Improve CRM, BI Tools
Android Passes RIM as Top Mobile OS in 2Q
VMware Updates Hyperic System Management
File Monitoring Key to Enterprise Security
LinkedIn Snaps Up SaaS Player mSpoke