Search:
Type: Posts; User: Bigjakkstaffa
Search:
Search took 1.31 seconds.
-
-
Moving up to 133Mhz or 166Mhz FSB would give a rather healthy boost in performance.
A common practice amongst AMD users who dont overclock is to lower the multiplier and raise the FSB, as such...
-
I woudl try overclocking the FSB of the RAM and CPU, even if the RAM cant take much, as its a P4 system you can run the CPU asynchronous (i.e. at a different FSB) to the RAM and still see a...
-
3dmark2003 doesnt, simply because it favours DX9 hardware so highly. Soem benchmarks were done a while back of a Radeon 9700 Pro on a 350Mhz P2 Vs a Gf4 ti and XP1700+ box, the R9700 Pro/P2 box...
-
The FSB is probably running Asynchronous to the FSB (ie less than 250Mhz), this gives a performance decrese for AMD's, but P4's being the bandwith hungry monsters that they are, works to their...
-
Yup the SPD settings for Crucial seem to err a bit too much on the safe side, you shoudl be abel to tighten em up quite a bit at stock and with a notch more VDIMM voltage they should be abel to run...
-
Your joking :eek:
Only took me 11 Hours to complete that game, admittedly i didnt do it in the 'stealthy' manner the game tries to coax one towards, in fact the last three levels were pretty much...
-
The 3.8's are apparently gonna be the shiznit
--Jakk:t
-
...and i havent even started drinking yet today :x
--Jakk:t
-
Tahst nti bad for a ti4200, in fact sounds abiout right, bear in mind on that rig with a r9800 pro you'll probably still only hit 16-17,000 marks
--Jakk:t
|
|