Search:

Type: Posts; User: gregmatic

Search: Search took 0.05 seconds.

  1. Replies
    1,229
    Views
    1,024,187

    lol

    lol
  2. Replies
    1,229
    Views
    1,024,187

    haha extremists. its true that futuremarke has...

    haha extremists. its true that futuremarke has f**ked up big time here. i think your display error could be due to directX(u have to have dx9 installed!!) or OS based. why did u get a 9000 pro...
  3. Replies
    1,229
    Views
    1,024,187

    no! WTF are YOU TALKING ABOUT! i got 1401 with...

    no! WTF are YOU TALKING ABOUT! i got 1401 with gf4ti!
  4. Replies
    1,229
    Views
    1,024,187

    yup, ur right. its either hacked thru xml editing...

    yup, ur right. its either hacked thru xml editing or hes just lying. NO, i repeat, NO 64mb card will get above 2000...period.
  5. Replies
    1,229
    Views
    1,024,187

    There's a serious flaw with this benchmark, guys....

    There's a serious flaw with this benchmark, guys. If you read the manual, a recommended card would have 129mb of ram. i can safeley say that 75% of us use GeForce cards, be it Mx, Ti or even TNT....
  6. Replies
    1,229
    Views
    1,024,187

    what the? 6286? more like 686 to be believable....

    what the? 6286? more like 686 to be believable. if you had seen the Thread Title its "3dmark 03 scores!!!". u must be using 3dmark 01. anyway i got 1401 for my pc running WinXp(i think sthis OS has...
Results 1 to 6 of 6