For 95% of my burning -- NERO!
For the other 5% -- CloneCD!
Harder
Printable View
For 95% of my burning -- NERO!
For the other 5% -- CloneCD!
Harder
Nero burning ROM for sure!!
Rulezzz!!
I had Easy cd creator which came bundled with my writer, gave me nothing but headache.
Maybe they've improved since then, because it was awhile back but I would go for Nero.
Replicat is the burning software of choice for me. Lots of great functions. I do use fireburner though for .bin .cue error checking, that's the ONLY thing though.
Given the above 2 options:Quote:
Originally posted by belgarath16
Well......I got that Idea from one Kris Jamsa, PH.D., MBA.
A very thorough book on PC performance, upgrading, tweaking, etc. It hasn't steered me wrong (YET).
Either way, my problem was solved...so thanks for all the input.
BTW....which way is correct?
What if you slave an ATA\100 HDD to an ATA\33 CDROM with the latter as Master?
Or....slave an ATA\33 CDROM to an ATA\100 HDD with the latter as master?
Or does it even ****ing matter?:D :D :D
The correct configuration is to slave the CD-ROM to the (Master) HDD on the Primary IDE Port.
Of course, if you have other devices, the configuration will change accordingly.
Nero!
then clone cd for its purposes....
and finally B's recorder Gold.... Came with my sony cdrw and has yet to make a bad disk.:D
Nero is great.
But sometimes Blindwrite does the job better.
And of course the immortal CloneCd along with ClonyXXL to give you better detection of protection type. All legal of course.
ß.Qµix