Printable View
My comp got owned!!!
XP 2400+
1 GB 3200 (dual channel)
Radeon 9500
All other apps turned off, and all settings default. I didnt look, maybe I should have, cause when I left, the test was running, when I came back 10min later, my comp had shut off.
Ouch!
Im gonna watch this time to see where it dies. Ill post when I know...
3210
A64 3200 Clawhammer
eVGA 6800 GT
time to get some new drivers, i am still running 61.77
but honestly i didnt like this benchmark as much as their older ones, it was way too taxing on my comp :rolleyes:
according to jakk's review article, 3dmark03 used several hundred thousand polygons per frame, this uses several million...soon there will be computers that will run this benchmark smoothly, just as there were when 03 came out.
1145
MY COMP SURVIVED!!!
I dont know if watching it was the trick (lol) but I managed to crank out an actual score this time.
Not bad for my comp which upon restart now says Im running a Duron.
My Comp:
XP 2400+
Radeon 9500 (non-pro) 128MB
1 GB PC3200 (dual channel)
All settings default
ill have to download and run this as soon as i get home. i have an A64 3000+, 1Gig of HyperX RAM, a 9800 Pro, and an ASUS K8V Deluxey. what kinda score should i be shootin for?
my guess would be between 2500 and 3000
Ive only run once but scored 2552 running full performance settings.
AMD Barton 2800+
A7N8X Deluxe
1gb Crucial PC3200
Radeon 9800pro
cool. id be happy with a 2500 to 3000. btw, does neone know how 3dmark 03 or 05 score on Windows 64-be? i would assume worse because there hasnt been as much driver research and coding for the 64-be, but who knows. i havent upgraded yet because, honestly, im chicken that the drivers wont work as well, or programs will have issues, or (heres the big one, as my card is an All-In-Wonder and it already *****es when i change its drivers) that the beta Catalyst drivers will have issues with me AiW card. oh well, anyone have any input?
I dont think they can run on windows 64 bit, only a 32 bit program i'd assume...
*Edit*
Perhaps you might be able to give it a shot:
"We were able to run a few 32-bit applications and benchmarks, and will discuss those in the performance test section. As we noted, 3DMark 2001SE ran with hardware T&L enabled"
http://www.extremetech.com/article2/...1276887,00.asp
2636
However this was on a PC that hadn't been rebooted for 3 days and its windows XP install was about 9 months old.
I'm going to do a reinstall over the next 3 days so I'll see if I can get anything better after that.
Athlon XP 64 3200+
512Mb
Radeon 9800XXL OC'ed to XT
I'm also about to get an Athlon 64 3500+ plus an additional 512Mb for 1Gb total, hopefully that'll get the numbers up a bit.
-edit-
2730 after a reboot, but my system is still chock full of crud.
Mobile 2400+ @ 2200MHz (512 Cache) (200x11) @ 1.42Vcore (Full load 45-48C°, ) / Mobo: Abit NF7-S rev.2 / Air Cooling /
Power Supply: Super Flower 450 ST
Vid card: ATi Radeon 9800 Pro (Default) – Air Cooling /
Mem: 1x512MB DDR (Crucial PC PC3200) @ CAS 2.5-2-2-5)
Set At 400 MHZ (2.94 Voltage)
2376
:t
Seems that the reviews are right when they say its video card limited rather than RAM or CPU.
In which case it isn't really a gaming benchmark. You'd sure not want to run doom3 on a 2000 Athlon XP with 384Mb, even with a top of the range video card.
WooHoo...Moving up!
Main Test Results
3DMark Score 2562 3DMarks
CPU Score 2971 CPUMarks
Downloaded the new version ATI Tool 0.0.22...Works alot better.
:cool:
2704 for me
NF7-S
Mobile 2600+ @ 2.3GHz (210x11)
1GB PC3200 1:1 @ 2-2-2-11
9800Pro @ 417/378 <~~~ I think thats what it was
Sold my 6800 Ultra as I recieved a Visiontech X800XT as a gift, on order, should come in a few days so I'm ruuing my trusty BFG 5900XT
AMD 64 3400+
MSI K8N Neo Platinum
512MB Corsair BH-5 2-2-2-5 DDR400
Nvidia 5900XT
1057:eek: :rolleyes:
Seems a bit low but I'll have the highest score with my X800XT, you just wait:D
