SysOpt Forums

System Optimization and PC Performance

[ Home | News | Features | User Reviews | Overclocking | Benchmarks | About Us | Forum FAQ

Go Back   SysOpt Forums > Modifications > Benchmarking

Benchmarking Discuss benchmarking, post your results, 3DMark 2000/2001, Sandra, all others.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 11-20-2001, 02:39 PM   #1
x51out
Ultimate Member
 
x51out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
Posts: 1,434
Host CLK vs. By SPD

I hope someone can help with an answer: what exactly is the difference between Host CLK and By SPD in Dram settings? In SANDRA Cpu test HostCLK is ALU 3821/FPU 1870, whereas By SPD is ALU 3824/FPU 1922, Multimedia test host clk 7734/8558, by spd 7921/8802, Memory test both hover around Alu 580/Fpu 710... I have set 6,2,2 with 4-bank interleaving (huge *numerical* performance boost). Somebody got a clue?
x51out is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2001, 06:34 PM   #2
NDD
Evil Lurks
 
NDD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Inner Mongolia
Posts: 6,576
You can usually configure manually many RAM parameters without using "By SPD" option, such as CAS and RAS delay. When setting "by SPD" option, you telling BIOS to use values stored on memory chips. Generally, RAM has no problem working beyond specs, so it's better to try for yourself, like you did

Best Regards ...
NDD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-20-2001, 10:27 PM   #3
x51out
Ultimate Member
 
x51out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Tucson AZ, 22 Dec. 2012
Posts: 1,434
Thanx for your reply. Also strange, maybe not entirely surprising, was an oc I undertook from default-multiplier 10.5x133fsb (DDR) to 11x140 (on a 1400 T-Bird, 512mbDDRram, ShuttleAK31v2.0/VIA chipset) with no real, worthwhile improvement. Ah well, the trials and tribulations... checketh thou later.
x51out is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:13 PM.


  • Weekly CPU Prices for February 5, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 29, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 22, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 15, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for January 8, 2010
  • Weekly CPU Prices for December 31, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for December 25, 2009
  • Weekly CPU Prices for December 18, 2009




    IBM Power7: Big Blue's Answer to Oracle, Intel
    Chip Stocks Stabilize as Market Fall Continues
    Mozilla Firefox to Drop Support of Mac OS X 10.4
    SAP's CEO Ouster Latest Indication of Troubles
    Oracle Adds SOA Depth with AmberPoint Deal
    Cisco Aims to Simplify Datacenter Migrations
    Google Earns High Marks for Super Bowl Ad
    Investors Unimpressed With NetSuite's Q4
    Facebook Says Adios to Microsoft Banner Ads
    Why Red Hat Had to Pull the Plug on Exchange


  • Acceptable Use Policy


    The Network for Technology Professionals

    Search:

    About Internet.com

    Legal Notices, Licensing, Permissions, Privacy Policy.
    Advertise | Newsletters | E-mail Offers


    Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
    Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Copyright 2002 Jupitermedia Corporation